My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02986
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:27:57 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:57:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2986
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
3090 CLEVELAND AVE N
Applicant
SCHREIER, JIM AND DEB
PIN
042923220008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Cunningham, to <br />recommend that the Council consider the formation of a task force for the larger <br />neighborhood (not just Cleveland Avenue). <br /> <br />Member Mulder stated that the neighborhood should prepare a vision, <br /> <br />Member Rhody noted that the strip along Cleveland is potentially a transition <br />zone. He felt the Commission and the neighborhood should provide direction <br />regarding the transitional zone now rather than reacting to another proposal. <br /> <br />Member Olson stated that the James Addition was reacting to a new <br />development. In this case (Cleveland Avenue) there is no development to react <br />to. <br /> <br />Member Wilke stated the timing is not right for a task force. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham stated that a task force should examine quality of life as <br />well as development potential and real estate value. The neighbors should look <br />out for what the future holds for them. <br /> <br />Chair Harms asked that the neighbors be notified of Council deliberation on the <br />need for a task force. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if boundaries were necessary? (No, to be left to the <br />City Council). <br /> <br />On a roll call: <br />Ayes: 4, Mulder, Cunningham, Rhody, Harms <br />Nays: 3, Wilke, Olson, Klausing <br /> <br />The motion passed 4-3. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.