Laserfiche WebLink
<br />01/27/1998 15:12 <br /> <br />5124841903 <br /> <br />· basement loc:ations. <br />The above factors are discussed in IFI ReguLatory and <br />LegJalative Overview No.6. <br />U Ole Ptlase I qualitalive s.IhI uaeesment showl Ihe poten- <br />~I for contamJnation, a Phase n Assessment Irwl'!stigiltion <br />may be recommended, Phase II assessments may conaist of <br />taIdng alt, soil. JUJ'mce wata', and/or gTOUmt water samples. <br /> <br />Purchasing Equipment <br /> <br />Putthasln8 equipment today I.s not a, easy .u it once Wa.9. <br />The CW'I'eI'\t trend is lor banking lenden to lend mongy bas.ed <br />on the borrower's penanal asset! rather than the as~ of the <br />business. This Is because of the potential for a businI!8s to ~ <br />involnd in environmental litigation. potential1y freezing <br />the assets of the business whereby the busiMss may not be! <br />able to "'pay the loan. This particular circumstance assumes <br />the business is incorporated and the penonal asseb of the <br />owner generally cannot be attached. More o.n corporate <br />liability will be discussed later in the bulletin. <br /> <br />Who Can Be Made <br /> <br />Responsible for the Cleanup? <br /> <br />The n!sponlibllHy for cleanup i, dearly one of the most <br />difflcuJt quesdons to answer. Every day. the courts make <br />decisions In this area and, in general, the number of pOh,"- <br />tially respon,ible parties for any cleanup is expanding. We <br />have already discu9ged that the 1l1'nders can be held respon- <br />sible for cleanup. Other parties who have also been found <br />liable for cleanup include le9sOfs. Many courts have role<! <br />that lessors of property be held liable simply because they <br />had knowledge of the IIctivities of the lessee. This, of course, <br />is far-reaching and may prevent drydeaners from leasing <br />locations like strip shopping centeno In fact, we have already <br />seen I In!nd in this area in IIOItII! regions of the country which <br />only allow dIy stores/satellite stores rather than fuU-gervke <br />dtyc1eanU\g plants. <br />One c:i the biggest veils of prdeclim an owner of a buslnl!B8 <br />can have is under the ItruI;h1res of incorpontiOl\. AI well as other <br />advlrltagas. incorporation anows the shareholders/ownm of the <br />busilll!!ll to bc!rome separlle from their pl!l'80~ l18~ts. This would <br />be especi.aUy helpful if II lawsuit or businm failure occun!d. Under <br />Supriund, how eve!', the courts have pil!l'C9d Uu! corpoutg wU <br />allowing owntn to become individually liable. <br /> <br />GARY MCLEAN INC <br /> <br />PAGE 05 <br /> <br />Federal and State Laws Related to <br />Contaminated Property <br /> <br />Su~rfund. ,tate, hI individual compan.les can be made <br />individually or collectively responsible for environmental <br />clelUlup of wash!!. While there are JIW1y envi..ronmental laws <br />that cover notification reqUirements for I!Ipills, accidental <br />releases, etc., nowhere is the issue of cleanup and liability <br />atated Ie dearly u it i9 in the Superfund law. &sid. Super- <br />fund, UIAIIY Ita!. require ,den to notify proepective buyers <br />about the current or past presence of on-site haurdous waste <br />IMKlrla18 (including; pi7!tro!ettrn.), and/or requlre su.pporting <br />documentation stating that no hazardous wasle discharges <br />have occurred on thl'! site. When we last reported. only one <br />or two slal2s had passed legislation, with .a few more pl!ndJng. <br />Currently, nine states have pasS@d property transfer legisla- <br />tion with at least 21 others pending. Surprising. however, is <br />that CI1e state, New Jmey, the Jim staN with a comprehens- <br />ive property transfer law, exempts dryclelUlers from any <br />aduat requirements under tIut law. <br /> <br />Is Help on the Way? <br /> <br />While we will continue to hay!! an u.phill battle with <br />regard to contaminated siles, one area where we may see <br />some retief i, in the ability to seek and obtain loan, from <br />lenders. House SmaU Business Committee Chairman John <br />1- Lafalce. (D-New York) has introdu~!!d bill HR 1450. <br />Representative Lafalce stated that he "is trying to prolect <br />small businesses that are being deprived of credit because <br />lenders fear Superfund liability if they make loan and lewr <br />fored0ge 01\ coneaminated. property." A simIlar Senate bill <br />hal!l 8150 Men. irltroducecl by Senator Jake Garn of Utah, <br />On ^pril 29,1992, the Environmental Protection Agency <br />issued a finallend.er liability rule which should also help to <br />make it easier for slNll buslnwses 10 8I!C\Jte loans. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />11W bulletin by no means covers all the potential elwi. <br />I'<'nmenta1 pl'tlblems that <'lIn ex.ist when buying and/ or <br />selling dryc1eening plants and purchasing equipment It is <br />irlbmded, however, to provide YOq with a greilter und{!t- <br />standing of the current climate conditions that exist with <br />regard. to the environment. <br /> <br />nu, buUetin was written by Jon Meijer, Legislative/Joint Stab! Liai90n <br />_111 II"- tI...-! StoIa.lJ1"""".....04 No..... 01.... -.II !My tJo ~_... on)'.......... by 01_... __ - ~ W_on -S- U1d -oj"Y"""" wi....... P""-"" <br />_..~. <br /> <br />RL-IO <br /> <br />10/92 <br />