Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Forestry <br />Consultants <br /> <br />2311 WOODOnlDGE ST. · ROSEVILLE. MINNESOTA 55113 · (651) t184-Q114 <br /> <br />UN DE CO. INC. <br /> <br />June 16, 1998 <br /> <br />Robert Kemnitz <br />1730 N. Chatsworth St. <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Kemnitz, <br /> <br />On June 15, 1998, I inspected your property to give my professional <br />{ opinion on the effects a proposed garage expansion on the adjacent <br />property would have on your trees. <br /> <br />'<. The trees in question are a Norway Maple, approximately 12" DBB <br />. (diameter breast height,) and a Sugar Maple, approximately 10" DBB. <br />The exact property line was not surveyed yet, but you had the <br />approximate line indicated based on your w . OJ' , I fence placement <br />and their proposed driveway and garage expansion. The Norway Maple <br />is approximately 7' to 8' from the proposed driveway, and the Sugar <br />Maple is approximately 11' to 12' froITI the proposed garage. <br /> <br />Both of the trees are close enough to the proposed construction <br />that their root systems will be impacted by the construction <br />acti vi ty. It should be noted that to adequately compact the soil <br />for the driveway and garage, the construction activity must occur <br />outside of the actual footprint of the garage and driveway, further <br />'! lInpacting the root zones of both these trees. In addition, the <br />electrical service drop to the house will have to be moved closer <br />to the trees, necessitating the pruning of both trees to provide <br />proper powerline clearance. Because' of the existing branch pattern, <br />this would open up a significant portion of the crowns on the south <br />side of both trees. The exposure of the thin bark On both trees <br />will predispq~_ them to sunscald inj ury, in addition to the impacts <br />of the construction process. <br /> <br />I certify that I have no present nor contemplated future interest <br />in the property inspected, and that neither the employment to make <br />this evaluation, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon <br />the assessed condition of the subject trees. I have no personal <br />interest in, nor bias with respect to, the subject matter of this <br />appraisal nor with the parties involved. I have inspected the <br />subject site, and to my knowledge, all statements and information <br />in this report are true and correct. <br /> <br />Resrectf~lly submit~ed, <br /> <br />jrL~~;e( ~ ['1'~ <br />S eRreD Brlll S nge <br />Consulting Forester <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />MEMBER: Minnesota Foreslry Asso-::iation - Society 01 American Foresters - Minnesola Society of Arboriculture <br />International Society of Atboriculture . American Forestry Association <br />