My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03029
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:30:14 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3029
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
1930 LEXINGTON AVE N
Applicant
SUBURBAN TRUE VALUE HARDWAR
PIN
142923230066
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />construct the building addition. <br /> <br />6. The north and east walls of the addition must be fire rated (four hour) with <br />no openings (windows or doors). The wall must be screened with <br />vegetation from the residential areas to the east. A plan has not been <br />submitted to date. <br /> <br />7. The exterior storage of equipment being repaired must be brought into <br />compliance with the City Code (no exterior storage allowed, except for <br />display areas allowed by 1990 conditional use permit; dumpster is to be <br />enclosed or placed in the building). <br /> <br />8. Landscape plan for area next to new addition shall be completed to the <br />satisfaction of the City staff and Townhome Association. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />Ayes: 5 (Wilke, Harms, Olson, Klausing, Mulder) <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Curb and paving: no ability to solve curb/gutter. Jay Kennedy advised parking was <br />updated in 1985, but no curbing was placed on the site. Storm sewer is available to <br />parking lot; no hardship. <br /> <br />Member Wilke: Sidewalk issue. Dedication of dollars for new sidewalk in commercial <br />areas. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, Member Klausing seconded, to amend the <br />motion by deleting the curb on the north side (snowplowing may be a problem) <br />until such time as parking lot is resurfaced, but curb is required on the west, <br />south and east side. <br /> <br />Motion fails. <br />Ayes: Mulder, Harms <br />Nays: Olson, Wilke, Klausing <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Member Wilke: Why prolong for ten years? Why not complete at this time? <br />Member Klausing: Would create a hardship on current owner because of last owner's <br />problems. The area of variance request has aesthetically poor vegetation; it would be <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.