My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03049
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:31:07 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3049
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2561 VICTORIA ST N
Applicant
PRINCE OF PEACE CHURCH
PIN
032923230019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />building in the northwest portion of the site (current proposal). The Commission also <br />expressed concerns with the impact of the structure on the park, the need to retain as much <br />existing vegetation as possible, a preference for a shared parking area with the park, and a <br />preference to construct only as many parking church spaces as actually needed at this time. <br /> <br />2.6 The Planning Commission held a second sketch plan review of this request on August 12, <br />1998. The plan presented at this meeting showed the senior housing building placed in the <br />northwest comer of the site and reduced the size of the senior building to 56-units and three <br />stories (current proposal). A height comparison was also presented which showed that the <br />peak of the roof of the senior housing building was approximately three feet higher than the <br />main peak of the church building. The relationship of the building to pathways and the <br />proposed parking lot was also reviewed. <br /> <br />2.7 On December 9, 1998, the Commission requested the developer to provide more line-of-sight <br />analysis. The Commission also requested the staff to analyze whether other similar sites are <br />available in Roseville (see the attached memo). <br /> <br />2.8 On December 14,1998, the City Council requested staff to investigate other options that may <br />be available for the Church and the City to acquire and develop the Church parking lot (see <br />the attached memo to City Manager, Steve Sarkozy). <br /> <br />2.9 Section 1008 of the City Code outlines the requirements and procedures for a planned unit <br />development, including a planned unit development in shoreland management district. The <br />property included in this proposal is within the shoreland management district of Bennett <br />Lake. <br /> <br />Section 1016.24 outlines additional planned unit development requirements for a planned <br />unit development in a shoreland management district. These standards require a maximum <br />floor area coverage (building footprint) of30%, minimum open space of 50% of the site, and <br />a maximum impervious surface coverage of 25% unless water is retained on site. <br /> <br />3.0 Staff Comment <br /> <br />3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The Comprehensive Plan designates the church parcel as Church and the residential <br />parcel to the south as Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan also <br />includes numerous goals and policies that support the development of a project such <br />as this, which are based on the following vision statement for residential areas: <br /> <br />Roseville shall be a community with an appropriate balance of attractive, <br />safe, well maintained housing alternatives. These alternatives shall be <br />available without discrimination in appealing, well kept, crime deterring <br />neighborhoods. Each neighborhood shall have appropriate City services, <br />parks, and open space located in an environment that provides adequate <br />educational, occupational, and spiritual opportunities. <br /> <br />PF3049 - RCA (01/25/99) - Page 4 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.