pf_03065 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I , I I I I '1 I. . I I - - . 6-27-1995 G: 22~J.\ FPOr1 P.3 Thert are several other tasks which will help to (ranslat:: rhcse community/school district fmdings 10 results that can be utilized for [he. n.:gwl1. One ta3k is the caJcubtion 0r prorolype fi sea I rt;sult~ for specific land uses. Unlike the cornpr~hCnS1Vi,; fi$ca! evaluauons conducted for the two scenarios, which include [hc interaction of the foreca!;[ed rcsldcntiaJJnunre5idcntialland use::;. the prototype fiscal analysis takes a snap shot of what the direct fiscal result is by type or laud use. We wdl calculate the cost (('I[ a single-family unit as well a$ the other rele....antland uses a:- discussed late;-. AnO(her task which will meet the objectives of this RFP is to work with Metro Council staff in preparing a regional fiscal impact assessment. The consultant ream wili bring its expertise from throughout the US and also help to funher interprd [he findings of the ten entities to develop a regionaJ tiscal impact ass.essment Another important task is the preparation of a paper on possible implementation strategies which recommends ways in which the various communities in the region might enbaDce the develop patterns in the Metro a...--ea. TASK 1 Proyide Technical Assistance Regarding Scenarios for Each Community and/or School District. A critical first step is to further define the t\VO scenarios. current ,rends and the Council's adopted regional growTh strategy. in terms of land use categories. Smce the Council ~taff has community Icvel population. household and employment forecasts, we wia recomrnend the specific land use catcgorie:-: that should be utilized for each of tht: selected corrullurjtit:~ and school districts.. For example. there ;l;"t: iikely to be at least two residential ea[cgories and four nonresidential categories. The :>peciflc land us:.: c~Hegorics arc likely to vary by particular corrununi[y based on their zoningt1and use classit1cation. However an effort will be m;ideto evaluatc tairly standard c<Hegorics" A5 p;:ut of lhi, lask. we w:1I provide technical ~Uppor1. in detennining the employment allocation:) aod lanJ U$C categ.ory assumptions. As part of this task. we will also provide input to the list of non-fiscal impacts that Couneij slaff will study 'during the same time frame. An option for each of the selected conununitics and school districts "...ill be tt) have up to four fi~cal analysis zones or geographic subareas. The benefit of havmg such a fiscal analysis zone (FAZ) is h) allow a further retinement in the demands for services. available and excess capacity of capital facilities and different impacts on costs as well as possibly re\'cnues. For example, if St. Paul is one of the sample communities. there could be an area within the City where there is disinvestment. If an. F AZ rcl1cclc. d disinvcsmlcflt, T A .would consider not only the loss in revenues with.in that F AZ, but also .- .' .,; . increa.,ed costs incurred- (TA conducted one of the first dis!nV6lment fiscal analyses for Linle Rock). T A will discuss the practicality as well as the desirability of the speciti.c F AZs with (('\Uocil :\taff and those representing the community and/or school district. The hmd use assumptions will be forecasted for each FAZ. Therefore, it is likely that for some F/\Zs experiencing stagnation or disinvestment. there. may be decreases in certain types of land use. The forecasts will be for up to 20 years. \Vork Produce: Memoranda a.s Appropriate Commeming 0/1 t.<md Use ForecasIs and Narrative for [he Two SCilTlLlrios. ..., "- TrScrder 6. Associates. Inc