pf_03077 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The vrocess also allows the City to consider the location of the buildings. comvatibilitv. parking areas and other features with resvect to the tovogravhy of the area and existing natural features; the efficiency. adequacy and safety of the vroposed layout of internal streets and driveways; the adequacy and location of green areas; the adequacy, location and screening of varking areas; and such other matters as the Citv may find to have a material bearing on the stated standards and objectives of the Comvrehensive Land Use Plan. 2.0 Background 2.1 On March 10, the Roseville Planning Commission held the required public hearing regarding the above request. At this meeting a number of adjacent residents addressed the Commission regarding concerns with the location of the proposed structure and its proximity to the north and east property lines. Further, concerns were raised regarding screening and landscaping of the building that would be provided along the north and east property boundary. The residents also suggested that the entry tower be lowered. 2.2 The Planning Commission also raised a number of these concerns and requested further information by the petitioner regarding side (north) and rear yard (east) setbacks, landscaping, and architectural modifications, prior to receiving a vote on the concept PUD request. 2.3 On March 22, 1999 the City Council, by resolution, approve a 60 day extension of the 60-day review period, from March 22, 1999 to May 26, 1999, in response to the adjacent resident concern and Planning Commission's request of the applicant for further information regarding the development proposal. 2.4 Since the March 10 Planning Commission meeting the applicant met with City Staff and held a neighborhood meeting to discuss the concerns and present alternative modifications to the site plan. The applicant has provided a modified site plan and elevations taking into consideration the following issues: (refer to April 7, 1999 letter from Cryogenic Laboratories) The gross square footage has been reduced by 15 percent from 9,108 sfto 7,766 sf. East setback has been revised from 3 to 5 feet from the property line. The south side of the building has been pulled back 22 feet from the Suburban True Value Hardware building creating a landscaped separation between the buildings per the resident's request. Landscaping shall be place entirely on the applicant's property line and the east wall will be constructed of stucco in the form of a relief arcade with trellis and vines. The turret/tower has been reduced in height from 36 feet to 29 feet with illumination directed away from the east. PF3077 - RPCA (04-14-99) - Page 2 of6