Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. Seasonal <br />8. Public/private <br />9. Operational/maintenance costs <br /> <br />In January, Steve Sarkozy, City Manager, provided a summary of which uses have been <br />compiled by the administrative staff. He suggested: <br /> <br />a. Transit Village <br />b. Mini-Conference Center <br />c. Cable/TV technology center <br />d. County service center <br />e. Housing <br />, f. Private recreation area <br />g. Charter schools <br />h. Indoor playground <br />1. Home office service center <br />J. Day care facility <br />k. Indoor park <br />1. Neighborhood retail <br />m. Community library <br />n. Co-generation of energy <br /> <br />Details regarding" private recreation" uses have been discussed. How immediate <br />are these uses - when? The private sector is limited by available land. It is not <br />clear yet whether this is a "best fit" for the City. <br /> <br />Transit - what things may happen in next five to ten years. LRT, commuter' <br />trains, bike pathways, a bus lane are all possible, some on the same site. <br /> <br />Parking on the site is important. What are the possibilities for ramping. With <br />more uses, a parking structure would be necessary. Steve Sarkozy said the Task <br />Force must tell the City" What feels right" and are we ready for this new type of <br />development. <br /> <br />Kim Way reviewed the vision statement and suggested "testing" what can fit on <br />the site, after confirming all the uses that should be incorporated as a portion of <br />the City Center. <br /> <br />The February Task Force meeting was an opportunity for the members to think big and <br />futuristic. The City Center Planner, Kim Way asked the members to consider three <br />functional use options for the future: a government center, a recreation center, and <br />community center. <br /> <br />10 <br />