My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03193
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:55:46 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:59:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DEVELOPMENT REVIEW GUIDELINES & PROCEDURES <br /> <br />If the proposed lots fail to meet one or more of the applicable standards, then the <br />applicant must also apply for a variance (See the section ). <br /> <br />There are some platted residential lots within the City that are different than the current <br />standards. In reviewing requests for approval of lot splits in such areas, the City is <br />particularly interested in determining that the lots to be created will be consistent with the <br />character of the surrounding area. The narrative should present information to <br />demonstrate that the proposed lots will be comparable to those already existing in the <br />immediate neighborhood. <br /> <br />8. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan is the primary policy document that guides the development <br />and redevelopment of the City. All community planning decisions are made in <br />accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. A change in the Plan requires a formal hearing <br />by the Planning Commission and may also require a change in the property zoning <br />designation. <br /> <br />Some Comprehensive Plan amendments may represent relatively minor issues that are <br />different from the letter of the plan, but remain basically consistent with the intent of the <br />plan and its broader policy directives. Other amendments may represent significant <br />changes in major plan elements or policy. Obviously the nature and scope of the <br />narratives in these two cases will vary greatly. <br /> <br />The applicants should understand the nature of the proposed amendment and provide <br />both the necessary factual information, the impacts that such changes may have, and <br />pertinent policy justification in support of Comprehensive Plan amendments. Planning <br />staff members are available to assist in identifying issues, examples, and applicable <br />background. <br /> <br />9. Rezonings: <br /> <br />In approving a request for rezoning, the City searches for either one or both of the <br />following situations: I) a mistake was made when the original zOQing was approved, or <br />2) circumstances have changed since the original zoning that now justify a change. The <br />only rezoning that would not require such a finding would be rezoning to Planning Unit <br />Development (PUD) and that process is discussed separately below. Normally a change <br />in the zoning text or map requires a formal hearing by the Planning Commission and two <br />readings (at least two meetings) by the City Council. <br /> <br />The applicant should identify and explain the nature of the suggested mistake in current <br />zoning, and/or fully describe the changed circumstances that now justify the requested <br />rezoning. The applicant should also remember that zoning must be consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. While many rezonings may be inconsistent with the <br /> <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.