My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03209
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2007 10:06:45 AM
Creation date
12/9/2004 6:52:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3209
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1215 ROSELAWN AVE W
Applicant
Roseville Lutheran Church
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
5/22/2000
Planning Files - Resolution #
9772
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 green space. He suggested removing planting islands in the parking area <br />2 and thereby creating 18 parking spaces. <br />3 <br />4 He asked the Church to consider parking even further away, car pool, <br />5 vans to extend the variance to add zero spaces. (The Church did consider <br />6 this and decided to add 27 spaces). <br />7 <br />8 Heather Hawkens, 1144 W. Ryan, stated the park and open space should <br />9 remain; it is a valuable neighborhood asset. <br />10 <br />11 Chair Klausing clarified issues as to whether the Planning Commission <br />12 recommends that the Church deviate from the standards. <br />13 <br />14 Member Mulder stated that an interesting part of this issue is that the <br />15 petitioner (the Church) could install all 50+ spaces with only a building <br />16 permit. <br />17 <br />18 Motion: Member Mulder moved, Member Rhody seconded, to <br />19 recommend approval of the variance, based on findings as included in the <br />20 staff report dated May 10, 2000, as follows: <br />21 <br />22 1) From a photographic and on-site review of the parking areas, it is clear that <br />23 the Church already has a large paved area within a residential neighborhood. In <br />24 the past the Council has found that such large pavement users can deteriorate <br />25 neighborhood aesthetics, air quality, landscaping and green space, and <br />26 neighborhood sense of place. . The Council has asked the staff to work with <br />27 such large one-time "surge" parking needs to prepare "proof of parking" plans <br />28 and find other existing parking spaces to supplement their needs. The <br />29 additional on-site parking could be a community physical hardship since the <br />30 hard surface would take away green space and increase surface water <br />31 management issues in the area. <br />32 <br />33 2) As an alternative to the variance request, the Church could pave a portion of <br />34 the green space in the southeast comer of the parking lot adjacent to Bruce <br />35 Russell Park or near the tennis court to the north and east of the Church. This <br />36 is the "pave paradise...put in a parking lot" solution. <br />37 <br />38 3) Impervious Surfaces. Churches are known to be one of the most inefficient <br />39 land uses in terms of "at capacity" hours of use per week. The parking <br />40 demand peaks for 4 to 5 hours on Sundays only, less than 3 % of the entire <br />41 week, and less than 25% of the weekend daylight hours. In addition, staff <br />42 estimates that 25 % of a typical residential neighborhood is now impervious <br />43 surfaces; 50% to 80% of commercial sites are impervious; and nearly 10% of <br />44 all land within the community is impervious road surfaces. Recently the City <br />45 adopted Best Management Practices for surface water quality and storage. One <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.