Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, August 19, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />1 <br />2 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted highlighted several items of note, including the 2014 budget not including <br />3 <br />the NEP program, as that staff person was doing the rental licensing program inspections, but <br />4 <br />the NEP program would be incorporated in the 2015 budget as the first year in the upcoming <br />5 <br />cycle; staffing costs had gone down with the combination of the Housing Coordinator and <br />6 <br />Executive Director positions with former HRA Executive Director/Community Development <br />7 <br />Director Pat Trudgeon moving to the City Manager position; and the 2015 levy request <br />8 <br />compared to the proposed 2015 budget. <br />9 <br />10 <br />Discussion included rationale for building the HRA reserve funds to address timing of Ramsey <br />11 <br />County tax receipts, with the City’s Finance Director recommending 35% in reserve to avoid <br />12 <br />internal loans to maintain cash flow, with the proposed reserve amount still not at the full 35%, <br />13 <br />but closer than in past years and causing dependence on the City’s cash reserves; cash <br />14 <br />carryover estimates from 2014 with more refined numbers available later in the year; how <br />15 <br />estimates were determined for upcoming studies, used only as placeholders now and until it <br />16 <br />was determined if an intern was needed for implementation as a result of the graduate student <br />17 <br />program with the U of MN for the SE Roseville and Hotel/Motel studies to be done through <br />18 <br />Craig Waldron, Professor of that program. <br />19 <br />20 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that staff was in the process of providing a report to the HRA on their <br />21 <br />recommendation to modify the rental licensing program, and would be seeking authorization to <br />22 <br />apply for a grant in November of 2014, which would require budgeting for an intern to <br />23 <br />perform research if the grant was successful. <br />24 <br />25 <br />At the request of Member Masche, Ms. Kelsey reviewed the projected impact for a median <br />26 <br />valued home in Roseville ($215,340) with the proposed levy increase, approximately $4 more <br />27 <br />than in 2014, or $38.48 annually for the HRA portion of the property tax levy. <br />28 <br />29 <br />As a member of the HRA Finance Subcommittee, Member Masche spoke to the budget detail <br />30 <br />provided by staff and delineation of implementation of work plan items, as supported by the <br />31 <br />City Council, and the application of the 2015 budget toward those goals and tracking. <br />32 <br />33 <br />As the HRA continued those cooperative efforts with the City Council, Chair Maschka opined <br />34 <br />that the work plan and budget would be clearer going forward to achieve those goals. <br />35 <br />36 <br />Member Masche noted the significant projects accomplished to-date and those proposed going <br />37 <br />forward, and opined that they represented great achievements for the City and HRA in meeting <br />38 <br />those joint goals. <br />39 <br />40 <br />Member Majerus opined that the annual budget and levy detail should be incorporated as an <br />41 <br />explanation of program goals. <br />42 <br />43 <br />Chair Maschka noted that the HRA budget, in the past, had been more flat, but spoke in <br />44 <br />support of bringing the HRA funding reserves up to the Finance Director’s recommended <br />45 <br />level. <br />46 <br />47 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that, while the 2015 HRA budget was taking on an additional $80,000 in <br />48 <br />expenditures beyond 2014, the budget was actually only increasing by $40,000, accomplished <br />49 <br />by utilizing carryover dollars from 2014, as well as carrying HRA staff costs as an <br />50 <br />organization for payroll purposes, as the HRA has been able to built up its reserves. <br />51 <br />52 <br />While there was some philosophical disagreement on the reserve level numbers among <br />53 <br />individual Councilmembers that needed to be dealt with by that body, Chair Maschka <br />54 <br />expressed his satisfaction with the proposed budget, opining good explanations were provided <br />55 <br />for those expenditures. <br /> <br />