My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03223
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2007 4:05:13 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 6:53:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3223
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
1500 COUNTY ROAD B2 W
Project Name
Waters Edge
Applicant
MnDOT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />t~ <br /> <br />Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation <br />District 9 . <br />3485 Hadley Avenue North. Box 2050 <br />North St. Paul. Minnesota 55109 <br /> <br />',.... <br /> <br />(612) 770-2311 <br /> <br />November lOt 1980 <br /> <br />"";- <br /> <br />Mr. Charles Honche11 <br />Public Works Director <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Rosevillet Minnesota 55113 <br /> <br />In reply please refer to: 319 <br />C.S. 6216 (T.H. 51 at Co. Rd. B-2) <br />Traffic Signal Information <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Honche11: <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Wolsfeld of Bather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld, Inc., in a recent phone conver- <br />sation, requested. that we send you information as to signal requests and processing. <br />He was specifically talking about T.H. 51 and County Road B-2.(East Jet.). <br />Attached please find a traffic signal request for T.H. 51 and Co. Rd. B-2 we <br />received about.a year ago. <br /> <br />In reviewing this letter you will see we must consider a number of factors <br />(volumes, accidents, delay, intersection operationst other solutionst etc.) before <br />a traffic signal can be justified. In additiont because funds to install traffic <br />signals are limitedt we must then prioritize them. Currently, our Constructiun <br />Program for signals is.completely scheduled into 1982. <br /> <br />As we stated in the attached lettert we feel a traffic signal is not justified at <br />this timet but we will continue to monitor this intersection. <br /> <br />If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel free <br />to give me a call. <br /> <br />SincerelYt <br /> <br />d~~D~$~ <br /> <br />~ Mark R. Wikel ius, P.E. <br />District Traffic Engineer <br /> <br />cc: Richard Wolsfeld <br />Bather-Ringrose-Wo1sfeld, Inc. <br /> <br />An Equal Opportunit)' Emplo)'~r <br /> <br />-.. ............. ~-.......,..'~~~~"".p.~~...,..... <br /> <br />,,-~. ~-~..- <br /> <br />': :4.:~ .>. \ .\' :' ::'" ~..j...::. ',,: .: -,. . <br /> <br />. -,'..' - .' ,.... .. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.