Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4.5 <br /> <br />4.6 <br /> <br />4.7 <br /> <br />4.8 <br /> <br />4.9 <br /> <br />5.0 <br /> <br />5.1 <br /> <br />5.2 <br /> <br />5.3 <br /> <br />5.4 <br /> <br />The preliminary plat for the site combines the existing four small lots and then divides them <br />equally into two 35,824 square foot (0.82 acre each) lots. <br /> <br />Site access for the joint development is proposed at two locations: from Lexington Avenue at <br />the southern end of the office building (VSI parcel) and from Roselawn Avenue at the <br />convergence of both parcels (middle). These access points meet the city setback requirement of <br />50 feet from intersections. <br /> <br />A decorative masonry and metal border fence is proposed along the north side of the supportive <br />housing site and at the east and south end of the office building and its front (Lexington <br />Avenue) entry. The fencing and landscaping is intended to visually tie the two buildings <br />together. <br /> <br />Landscaping with irrigation is proposed throughout both sites including the pond area. Board- <br />on-board wood fencing (four sections) is proposed along the south property line adjacent to the <br />existing apartment complex to screen the parking lot. <br /> <br />Trash and recycling bins will be located in each of the structures. <br /> <br />PROJECT IMPACTS: <br /> <br />The Roseville Comprehensive Plan identifies three of the four (northwestern, and two southern) <br />parcels for future business use and the northeastern parcel for low density residential. <br />However, the four parcels have a zoning ofBl, Limited Business District, B-2, Limited Retail <br />District, and B-3, General Business District, which in the case of the northeastern parcel creates <br />a zoning/land use conflict. A separate application for Comprehensive Plan amendments would <br />be accepted after a positive City Council decision on the General Concept Plan. <br /> <br />Should the City Council support the proposed General Concept Plan, a Planning Commission <br />hearing on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the northeastern parcel would occur <br />on March 6, 2002 eliminating the zoning/land use conflict. The proposed Comprehensive Plan <br />change would amend the current designations from Business and Low Density Residential to <br />Business and High Density Residential as supported by the "concept plan" and preliminary <br />plat identifying each site. Metropolitan Council review and approval are required for any <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Parking. The Roseville City Code requires an office complex to provide five spaces for every <br />1,000 square feet of gross floor area and two spaces (1/2 covered) for each unit in a multiple <br />family development. The Code would require 80 spaces for the office complex and 44 (22 <br />covered) spaces. If this were a "normal" independent project, a total of over 120 parking <br />spaces would be required. This is not a "normal" development project from a parking <br />perspective; it requires a more specific parking to fit the proposed uses. <br /> <br />The applicants propose an off-street parking need/demand for offices that requires fewer <br />parking spaces than required by the City Code. Using net leasable area of 12,300 square feet <br />(building area, less non-occupied stairs, hall corridors, elevators, mechanical rooms restrooms, <br />lobby/atrium) versus gross square feet and applying a 4.5 per 1,000 square feet ratio (for local <br /> <br />PF3224 - RCA Accessible Space Concept Plan 030402 Page 4 <br />