Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.1 0 Copies ofthis staff report have been mailed to the owners and others associated <br />with the adjacent (west) property. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />4.1 Staff recommends the Planning Commission use the following outline to determine <br />findings of hardship. <br /> <br />4.2 The physical hardship, defined as ... , was (was not) created by the applicant (Jenson) or <br />existed prior to the applicant... <br /> <br />4.3 The unique physical features or situations within the proposal that could justify a <br />variance include ... <br /> <br />4.4 The economic issues that may (in part) justify a variance include... <br /> <br />4.5 The alternative designs that allow use of the site but do not require a variance include... <br /> <br />4.6 The impacts of the project, if the variance was issued, would (would not) create <br />significant community impacts on the health, safety, or general welfare including... <br /> <br />4.7 The unique physical access problems that the site creates for the applicant preclude <br />compliance wi ADA and the Fair Housing Act... <br /> <br />4.8 Other findings deemed appropriate by the Planing Commission... <br /> <br />5.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />5.1 By motion, recommend approval (denial) of the request by Ralph Jenson for a four <br />foot side yard setback variance from Section 703.04B2 and 703.04B9 of the Roseville <br />City Code for property located at 201 McCarrons Street, based on the findings of <br />the Planning Commission, and subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />A, Provision of a drainage plan that directs water to the south, toward the street, <br />not on to the neighboring lot. <br /> <br />B. Elimination of the eastern driveway and replacement of the area with sod and <br />landscaping. <br /> <br />OR, <br /> <br />PF3228 - RPCA (080900) Page 3 of 4 <br />