My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03236
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03236
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:03:27 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 6:58:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3.3 The Reichenbach/Anderson garage currently is a single stall structure that lies <br />approximately two feet into the neighboring (south) property. The removal ofthis garage <br />would eliminate a pre-existing non-conforming use. <br /> <br />3.4 The Reichenbach/Anderson's have three vehicles, a boat, a motorcycle, and personal and <br />lawn items they wish to store inside, especially in the winter months. <br /> <br />3.5 The proposed detached accessory structure and associated driveway/patio improvements <br />and the existing house would create 3,141 square feet (41 %) of impervious area. <br /> <br />3.6 Because of the design of the house, placing a garage in the front and attached to the <br />house is not feasible, even with the 50 foot front yard setback. If this were feasible, no <br />extended driveway and lot coverage variance would be necessary. <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit: <br />3.7 The proposed 832 square foot detached garage requires a conditional use permit (CUP) <br />as per City Code Section 1004.01A.12. Accessory structures are limited to 40% of the <br />rear yard area of a lot or in this case 750 square feet. <br /> <br />3.8 Section 1013.01.D ofthe Roseville Zoning Ordinance lists the criteria reviewed when <br />considering the issuance of a conditional use permit. The criteria are as follows: impact <br />of parking; impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; compatibility of site plan, <br />internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and structures with contiguous properties; impact <br />of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; impact on the general public <br />health, safety, and welfare; compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />3.9 Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section <br />1013.0l.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the proposal meets these <br />criteria. Specifically, the proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic nor <br />the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, <br />drainage, and landscaping, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property <br />or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In <br />addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low density <br />residential uses. <br /> <br />3.10 Conditions may be attached to the CUP that would mitigate additional impacts on <br />adjacent properties including such items as increased setbacks from property lines, <br />landscape screening, architectural color and design/materials details, drainage provisions, <br />and limiting additional exterior storage. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Establishment of Variance Findings: <br />4.1 Staff recommends the Commission use an outline of the following possible findings to <br />determine whether there is an "undue hardship" significant enough to recommend <br />approval of a variance by the City Council. <br /> <br />PF3236 RPCA (071200) - Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.