Laserfiche WebLink
T � <br />� <br />A'IEMORANDUM <br />RE: M�rgolis Request <br />� <br />?_0 January 1984 <br />Page 3 <br />that due to the screening existing and proposed that this will not be <br />visible from the south or the Past. <br />4. The planting con�tiguous to the east fence line shall be installed as <br />indicated Qn the Proposed Site Usage Plan to include the �nstallation <br />of the originally propnsed ivy from Point "R" indicated on the plan <br />to Point "B°'. This pla.;�ting is to be completed by 1 July 1984 as <br />a f.inal deadli.ne, thouqh IKr. Margolis indicates they will do it <br />earZier in tlze spring, as soon as it i� <br />s practical. <br />S•� The topsoil storage area will remain where it is, but sha11 be limited <br />to 2,000 cubic yards with the provision that no additional topsoil be <br />brought in during the 1984 season. More important, the hours of <br />operation of the total facility will be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 <br />p.m, on weekdays and 9:00 a.m, to 6:00 p,m. on Saturdays. Tt i� <br />further stipulated that no loading or unloading of topsoil shall <br />occur prior.to 7:30 a.m. With respect to the hours of operation� <br />Mr, Margolis noted that nccassionally (not more than a half dozen <br />times) a delivery truck may arr�ve after the 6:00 closing hour from <br />an external source and in these instances .ther� may be unloading of <br />materia� after 6:00 p.m. This proviso, however, is not to extend <br />the normal staff working hours at the site past 6:00 p.m, in the <br />evening, nor before 7:00 a.m. in the mornin <br />stipulation.as to working hours will alleviate theenoise�problem at <br />the northwest corner of the site. <br />6. The telephone signal system will be moved from its present location <br />to the n�w storage facility. It should be further stipulated that <br />this "buzzer" shall be tuned so as to not be readily �udible from <br />the residential property to the northeast. <br />7. The chain link fence across the southeast corner of the site shall <br />be completed.as originally proposed, This fence will not perform <br />a particula.r screening function, but should add to the security of <br />the site from this direction. We were originally concerned about <br />putting a chain link fence in the drainage area, but David Drown <br />informs us that this drainage area is not a"fl,owag�" and thus the <br />existance of the fence would not impair t he drainage function. <br />Hopefully, the agreed upon changes in condition as illustrated on the <br />Proposed Site Usage Plan and confirmed by �le agreement statement submitted will <br />solve the principal problems relating to the proposed use of this site. Any <br />action approving the application should be done on the conditions that the <br />development occur exactly in conformance with the proposed plan as revised <br />16 January 1984, and in accordance with the statement submitted by Mr, <br />Margolis dated 18 January 1984. The completion of all changes should be <br />accomplished by 1 July 1984. The usage, of course, is not ideally compatible <br />with contiguous residential development. Considering the use as an interim <br />use, however, it should he far more reasonable under the conditions proposed <br />if two things occur.. One is that the improvements as proposed are <br />