pf_03276 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2.10 Section 10 - Community Facilities: The City razed one of its community facilities in the Year 2000. The Arona building was demolished in November 2000 and the City will be considering site redevelopment proposal in 2001. 2.11 Section 11 Implementation Strategies: The City ofRoseville continues as a partner in the North Metro I-35W Corridor Coalition, a collaborative planning process for the 35W that included six other cities. In 2000 the Build-Out Study was completed and adopted by the Coalition Board of Directors in which the Coalition designated Rosedale and Twin Lakes as the one "suburban activity center" within the subregion. The Roseville City Council also approved amendments to Sections, 1002 (Rules & Definitions), 1006 (Shopping Center District), 1007 (Industrial Districts), 1008 (Planned Unit Developments), 1010 (Design Standards Regulations), and 1013 (Conditional Use; Variances. For further information contact the Roseville Community Development Department. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is required by State Statute to be part of the Comprehensive Plan review process in this sense: Annually, the Planning Commission is to review the list of implementation projects (for 2001) and advise/affirm whether they are consistent with land use provisions and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission is also to review the remainder of the five year CIP as a "guide" and advise on consistency with the Plan or recommend changes in the Plan to create more consistency. The Commission is not charged with the task of reviewing and advising on financial feasibility or budgetary issues. 2.12 Section 12 - Appendices: Comprehensive Plan Appendices, Book 2 continues to be updated to retain implementation programs and other works for each Section. It also contains a summary of the five-year capital improvement program, which is updated annually and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 3.1 The Planning Staff recommends affirming these changes and officially including them in the Plan and noting their inclusion in the addenda sheet at the beginning of the plan, an example of which is attached to this report. 4.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION PROCEDURE 4.1 On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission will hold the required public hearing. After the hearing, the Commission closes the hearing. By a resolution the Planning Commission reaffirms the changes (and any additions/deletions) made to the Plan during 2000, adopts the outline for placement in the plan and recommends that the changes be placed within the Comprehensive Plan, and advises that the CIP is (is not) consistent with the Plan. The Plan is then sent to the Council for its action. 4.2 Assuming that the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission, copies of the Plan are distributed via the internet and compact disk. Copies are also sent to the Metropolitan Council to update the City's file. PF 3276 - RPCA (12/13/00) - Page 3 of 4