pf_03280 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2.4 Sec1nol!1l RO:ll.((j).22AR (Nol!1luCol!1l[orrmn1nes) s1njp>!Illll21es 1ihl21 nnonnucoII1l[oJrmities can iContinue but ~ue slUIbject to alPjp>llfc2blle St21e St2tlJ.ntes 2mll Cfity OIrdlnl!1lall1lce JreganHng alterations, repair aft'teJr damage, dnscol!1ltnl!1lmmce o[ lUIse, 2nndl nnntel!1lsnfkatnol!1l o[ !Illse. The Vesterholt house has been determined to be a pre-existing non-conforming structure that was constructed prior to the City adopting Shoreland, Wetland, and Storm Water Management regulations. The specific non-conformity is tr..e distance the principal structure is setback (56 feet) from the Ordinary High Watermark. A variance is necessary to bring the house into conformity with the City Code, which requires a 75-foot setback from the OHW. 2.5 Sectnol!1l RO:ll.((j).:ll.((j) (StJrlUldlUllI"e ]jJ)esngl!1l St21!1l(!]]aJridls) Jre((jj!lllnJres stJr!llld!lllJres to be set baclk a mnl!1lnmlUlm oJ!' 75 [eet [rrom tihle oJridlnl!1larry ihlngihl wa1errm2rrlk (OJHIW). The northwest COr.1er of the Vesterholt house is set back 56 feet from the OHW. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has commented that although the proposed garage addition does not increase or affect the current non-conforming setback, it is in the best interest of the property to seek a principal structure setback variance from Section 1016.16 of the Roseville City Code. The variance would be for a 19-foot setback deviation and if granted, would eliminate the non- conformity and potentially the need to receive additional Council approval for future improvements. 2.6 Chart to review required variances: COLe JReOQJnremell1lt JE"fistfill1lg Comlitfioll1l ]Proposed! COll1ld!fiHmn Varaance Commfimn Lot Width at Shoreline 100 feet 160 feet Same NA Lot Area 15,000 SQ, f1. 19,134 sq, f1. Same NA ][mpervious Coverage 25% (4,784 SQ, f1.) 21 % (4,095 SQ, f1.) 22% (4,275 sq, f1.) NA Shoreland Setback 75 feet 56 feet Same 19 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet 15 feet 7 feet 23 feet Side Yard Setback 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Vehicle ]Parked in ]ROW 3.0 ST AIFIF COMMENT 3.1 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur w:ten it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3.2 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of tl:e locality. 3.3 Conditions may be attached to a variance that mitigate the impacts on adjoining properties. PF3280 - RCA (012201) Page 2 of 5 ,_.~-, -"-l1li_, _,II" I, _,_,a._,L_. -