2014_03_05_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, March 5, 2014 Page 12 Member Murphy concurred with Member Boguszewski, and spoke in support of the 562 motion. Member Murphy noted that Section 7 of the staff report provided conditions that 563 would need to be met for foot candle light, regardless of the height of the poles, including 564 those on the west end of the property line. 565 Member Stellmach spoke in support of the motion, stating that he was sympathetic to the 566 public comments; but saw the information provided in the plan and photometric plan to 567 create the lowest lighting necessary to light the field and abide by the standards and 568 conditions as outlined. Member Stellmach also recognized the alternate process for 569 residents to address their sound concerns and other concerns as noted. 570 Chair Gisselquist spoke in support of the motion, stating that the lighting plan appeared to 571 be proscriptive and mandated according to that plan; with alternatives for residents to 572 address their concerns if existing sound issues are evident. Although Chair Gisselquist 573 personally questioned if some of those concerns may be more of a personality issue that 574 is serving to create an ugly situation, he stated that he would need hard facts to back up 575 any allegations that the day-to-day operations at Northwestern and the athletic fields 576 were degrading property values. Chair Gisselquist opined that the proposal seemed to 577 him reasonable and it appeared that Northwestern was attempting to be a good neighbor. 578 Member Cunningham spoke in support of the motion; but thanked tonight’s speakers for 579 coming out and also thanked college representatives for their attendance and for their 580 professionalism even with apparent conflicts among those testifying. Member 581 Cunningham again clarified that tonight’s proposal was only related to lights, and urged 582 the college to perform a voluntary sound assessment of the neighborhood to ensure they 583 were in compliance with State Statute, and in an effort to address any legitimate 584 concerns of the neighborhood if not already addressed with the redirected public address 585 system being proposed, as well as previous actions taken with the existing system. 586 Member Cunningham encouraged neighbors to look into the process outlined tonight to 587 address any remaining concerns; opining that, as a Planning Commissioner, she did not 588 feel those concerns were within her role to consider in her vote tonight. Member 589 Cunningham noted the definitive map laid out for Northwestern to keep the lighting level 590 in compliance with that photometric plan. Member Cunningham encouraged the 591 neighbors and college to keep working together to address any ongoing noise issues if 592 evidenced. 593 Member Daire noted that a number of questions had been raised for him; and when he 594 spoke with Mr. Callaghan, he indicated that it would be his desire that he not be able to 595 see the lights. However, when looking at the St. Thomas University example, he noted 596 the fall off of light on either side of the lights, with those light standards, as proposed for 597 this field, to focus on the field. Member Daire noted that, while he could see lights, the 598 level of that lighting was not something of concern to him if he could see lights, but not of 599 any bother versus no lights at all, meaning no night games or impairing the safety of 600 those playing at nights. Member Daire advised that he was sensitive to fields being 601 higher than residences around the lake, especially on Shorewood Lane, especially as 602 referenced to Mr. West’s comments. However, Member Daire noted that the stadium 603 would be focused away from that neighborhood and not on the current periphery, which 604 had to account for something related to noise mitigation as well. Member Daire opined 605 that the argument that noise would be bouncing off dorms and back into the 606 neighborhood seemed to him a weak argument. As a neighbor within 900 yards of the 607 Roseville Area High School fields, which were probably larger than this field, Member 608 Daire agreed with the comments of Mr. Willenbring, that this is an urban versus rural 609 area, and that was part of the excitement of living in a city. While recognizing that others 610 may not like that excitement, Member Daire expressed his understanding. On balance, 611 Member Daire stated that he would be voting in support of the motion as far as lighting 612 was concerned; and even if sound was included as part of that motion, he would remain 613 inclined to still support the motion. 614