Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_-9.1/07/01 WED.J..1:32 FAX 612 296 7782 <br /> <br />METRO MANAGERS OFFICE <br /> <br />141002 <br /> <br />Mr. Dennis Welsh <br />March 7, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The EA W included a detailed traffic study to examine the potential impacts of the proposed project's <br />addition to smrounding area and the existing project. The construction of the Twin Lakes Parkway and <br />upgrading of County Roads C and D were asswned in the traffic analysis to reduce congestion and to <br />ensure a better traffic flow to and from the development. With this assumption, traffic assignments, <br />future projections, and traffic volumes, as well as capacity calculations were based on the premised that <br />the assumed roadway were completed and operating as functional facilities. The assumed improvements <br />would need to be completed and open to traffic before a certificate of occupancy is issued by the city of <br />Roseville. <br /> <br />A traffic analysis was performed for each of the ten intersections using the traffic volumes forecasted for <br />the three development concepts. All movements at all the five signalized intersections are expected to <br />operate at level of service (LOS) D or better in the 2004 p.m. peak bour under the cmrently proposed <br />development. With regards to the un-signalized intersections, only the North Centre Pointe <br />Drive/Cleveland Avenue may warrant a traffic signal in the future to mitigate the poor, LOS. Others are <br />expected to operate at an acceptable level. With the roadway improvements proposed, no significant <br />negative traffic impacts are anticipated as a result ofthe proposed project's addition. <br /> <br />A detailed air quality analysis assessing carbon monoxide (CO) impacts near roadway intersections that <br />will be affected by the development was included in the EA W. Forecast traffic data were used to model <br />predicted CO concentrations. The modeling was done using the most current versions oftbe <br />Environmental Protection Agency's CO emissions model (MOBIL5a) and dispersion model <br />(CAL3QHC). The analysis showed that with all the intersections analyzed in the study area, the projected <br />one-hour and eight-hour maximum CO concentrations would remain below the state ambient CO <br />standards for all the analysis years. Therefore, no significant air quality impacts are expected from the <br />proposed projecfs addition. If you have any questions pertaining to air, traffic, or the ISPt please contact <br />Innocent Eyoh at (651) 769-2591 <br /> <br />Thank you again for the opportunity to review the EA W. Should you have any questions about this letter <br />in general, please call me at (651) 296-8643. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />4eI2~ <br /> <br />Eric J. Kilberg <br />Planner Principal <br />Operations and Planning Section <br />Metro District <br /> <br />EJK.:gs <br /> <br />cc: Mike Finndorf, Metro District, Community and Area Wide Section <br />hmocent Eyoh, Policy and Planning Division, CommW1ity and Area Wide Section <br />Don Perwien, Metro District, Regular Facilities Section <br />