Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission and Council review the PUD amendment again when the EA W and <br />comment is complete, prior to the City Council decision on the EA W. <br /> <br />;,; <br />.J <br /> <br />5.3 In late March, the City Council would then review additional Planning Commission <br />recommendations; receive comment on the EA Wand decide on the Council's declaration of <br />EA W adequacy and impact. Assuming there are no additional significant environmental <br />impacts, the Council could then also approve the amendment to the Final Planned Unit <br />Development documents. <br /> <br />6.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />6.1 The Planning Commission after a hearing on January 10, 2001, recommended that the proposed <br />land use (business office) was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Centre Pointe <br />PUD intent. They recommended that the Voluntary EA W be completed based on the proposed <br />uses. The Commission agreed to review the EA Wand comments at their March 14,2001 <br />meeting. <br /> <br />7.0 SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />7.1 By motion, the Council finds the land uses proposed within the Veritas amendment (122,000 s.f. <br />of additional office space) to the existing Planned Unit Development to be consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan and the intent of the 1997 Centre Pointe PUD and approves the distribution <br />of the Voluntary EA W for review, with notice to be published concerning its availability. <br /> <br />8.0 FUTURE STEPS: <br /> <br />On January 22, 2001, assuming that the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission, <br />the Council must then approve the distribution of the Voluntary EA W for review. After the 30 <br />to 45 day period in which state, county, local agencies and the public review is completed, and <br />subsequent Planning Commission comments added, the Council must then determine whether <br />there are any significant new environmental impacts. If there are no significant impacts, the <br />Council action may be to provide a "negative declaration" - which means there are no <br />significant impacts that would require further environmental analysis and additional mitigation <br />than what is proposed. <br /> <br />Report by: Thomas Paschke (651-490-2236); Dennis Welsch (651-490-2232) <br /> <br />Attachments: Partial EA W; Site Plans <br /> <br />60-Day Time Limit: Not applicable. <br /> <br />Q:\Planning Files\3283 _ V eritas\RCA (01220 I ).doc <br /> <br />PF 3283 - RCA (01/22/01) - Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />-- -------- <br /> <br />_uIITIIIIIIII.UIIIIIIII <br />