Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.11 The City has completed a review of all housing in a two mile radius, which concludes that <br />housing mix is 41 % rental and 59% owner occupied (see Attachment 1). <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF COMMENTS & FINDINGS <br /> <br />4.1 The vacant parcel has limited ability to be developed given the pond, easements, and setbacks <br />applicable to a specific zoning district. <br /> <br />4.2 The change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning classification fit well into the <br />adjoining neighborhood. Specifically, multiple family districts are usually considered transitional <br />zones between single family detached residential areas and commercially zoned property. This <br />allows the multi-family residents better access to commercial areas and reduces the amount of <br />multi-family cut-through traffic which travels through a R-l area to the commercial areas and <br />community collector streets. In the Cave proposal, single family residentially zoned property lies <br />directly west and commercially zoned property lies directly east. The parcel has direct access to a <br />County community collector street (B-2) and is within 800 feet of a minor arterial street (Rice <br />Street). <br /> <br />4.3 The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed development plan and the <br />applications for the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning. The DRC determined that <br />the roof design should be modified to include dormers, and the facade should be visually <br />broken-up by including decks. These items would reduce the scale, add human and residential <br />proportions, and add visual amenities to an otherwise plain elevation and roofline. <br /> <br />4.4 Though the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of this property is Business, the DRC has <br />concluded that the parcel, as a remnant, would be difficult to develop as a commercial property <br />because of coverage, parking requirements, and compatibility with adjoining residential <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />4.5 Staff has determined, if the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning are approved, that the <br />proposed 18-unit apartment complex would be consistent with the R-3A multi-family district and <br />the city life-cycle housing programs. <br /> <br />4.6 Sanitary sewer and watermain are available to the parcel from existing lines within the County <br />Road B-2 right-of-way. These services must be sized appropriately for the development and <br />reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. Land area is available to accommodate <br />the use and the required retention pond. <br /> <br />4.7 The storm water calculations pertaining to the designJIocation of the management pond proposed <br />to the rear (north) of the lot adjacent the wetland will need to be submitted to the Engineering <br />Department for review and approval. <br /> <br />4.8 As of 2001, County Road B-2 had not been programmed in the five year Capital Improvement <br />Program for reconstruction in this area. However, in 2003 the City will construct a trail along <br />one side (yet to be determined) of County Road B-2. The applicant will be responsible for <br />provision a sidewalk/trail fee for the linear length of the parcel. <br /> <br />PF3293 - RPCA 031401 Page 3 of7 <br />