Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The EPA hired two independent laboratories for the testing, this metal are found to be ,!!il!her in a <lentist's o.ffice than in a cre- <br />and agency staff collected samples as well. They tested for the fol- matory, he said. Rahill also cited a recent study completed in the <br />lowing: @ United Kingdom in which soil samples tested for mercury down- <br />. metals (cadmium. mercury and lead); stream of a crematory rated at a level suitable to grow foQ.!;.I for <br />. particulate matter (dust, ash, etc.); ~!b&P~lmDtiQD. - <br />. hydrogen chloride; @ Carbon monoxide. Levels of this gas were found to be almost <br />. opacity (visible smoke); nonexist~nt.. ''They were less than I percent of what is now regu- <br />. dioxin-furans (medical waste); lated In the United States for crematories," Rahill said. <br />. carbon dioxide; <br />. oxygen; <br />. sulfur dioxide; <br />. nitrogen oxide; and <br />. carbon monoxide. <br /> <br />Preliminary Results <br />As of August 27, CANA had received and analyzed preliminary <br />results on a number of the tests, as follows: <br />Particulate matter. The levels of particulate matter at all three <br />temperatures were found to be lower than that from a standard <br />home fireplace. The lower the temperature, the less particulate <br /> <br />01.. <br />," <br />o <br />':z: <br />~ <br />l <br />," <br />.V <br />~~. <br />'0 <br />'... <br /> <br /> <br />. Before scrubber <br /> <br />. After scrubber <br /> <br />14000 16000 18000 Fireplace <br /> <br />matter. "The emissions were lowest at 1400 degrees and signifi- <br />cantly higher at 1800 degrees. which is just the opposite of what <br />every environmental regulation department has been preaching <br />for the last IS years," Rahill said. ''They would tell you it would <br />be just the reverse. But this is reality. This is fact." <br />Particulate matter levels actually increased slightly after going <br />through the scrubber. According to Rahill, this occurred because <br />crematory pollutants are corrected to a standard oxygen level. The <br />introduction of water increases oxygen levels, thereby amplifying <br />the correction and the resultant levels of some pollutants. <br />@> Mercury. According to Rahill, mercury emissions were found <br />to be "guite ~w and fairlv harIT\jess." By comparison, levels of <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />t)o <br />~~ <br />.... <br />,i <br />'" <br /> <br />I Before scrubber <br /> <br />II After scrubber <br /> <br />~\ <br /> <br />Crematories Dentists' offices <br /> <br /> <br />'i,fS:"Su'lnma'iiV,j:;,8,1ih:+':': ; <br />oi1'6~id~:)EMjs~'i&-n~':,~~.. <br />.... . '" -. "'. '" ~,..'.".." "'..~'.:.J R'", .,' ", , . ,.. ". <br /> <br />'.:.~ ~,~ <br />I <br />'~ <br />>:81 <br />.~~ <br />1'.1\1 ~ <br />i~ <br />~:51 <br />~'" <br />I~~ <br />~~ <br /> <br />3.5 <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2 <br />1.5 <br /> <br />16000 <br /> <br />Opacity. Only the emissions at 1800 F reached an opacity <br />level higher than 5 percent, the level at which emissions are visi- <br />ble to the human eye. At 1400 F, emissions registered at 1.25 per- <br />cent; at 1600 F, they were 2.57 percent; and at 1800 they equaled <br />10.83 percent. <br /> <br />9 <br />i! <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />I!] After scrubber <br /> <br />14000 16000 18000 Visible <br />Smoke <br /> <br />Implications <br />A final report on the stack testing at Woodlawn was due out in <br />September, shortly after press time. Based on the preliminary <br />information, Rahill concluded: "The data is extremely consistent <br />with what data we do have, so there were no shocks. We do see a <br />consistent thread throughout the data that the higher the tempera- <br />ture, the worse the emissions get, and it's going to be interesting <br />when we go back to the EPA to start negotiating again how they're <br />going to deal with that. We also saw in looking at the scrubber <br />-# data that. the addition of a scr~~ber of.J'ollution control de'(jse had <br />little or no be,lclits on cremation equipment, so again, it will be <br />interesting to see how they receive that." <br />For additional information on the report or to contribute to the <br />test funding, ICFA members can contact CANA at (312) 644- <br />6610. <br /> <br />-Linda Acorn <br /> <br />October 1999 L5 <br />