Laserfiche WebLink
<br />d. If a, b, or c, were marked yes, discuss any cumulative environmental <br />impacts resulting for this project and the other development. <br /> <br />Centre Pointe Business Park fronts I-35W through Roseville, a mature <br />first-ring suburb. The site had previously been used by a service station, <br />trucking operation, and residences until it was cleared in the mid-1980s for <br />the Centre Pointe project. Current adjacent land uses include roadways, a <br />stormwater pond, and office buildings constructed as part of the original <br />Centre Pointe development. Trucking operations and residences can be <br />found immediately beyond Centre Pointe. Centre Pointe Solutions <br />proposes completing the redevelopment of a partially completed business <br />park. Once complete, the cumulative environmental impact of Centre <br />Pointe to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects is <br />expected to be minimal. Compared with the site's historic uses (i.e.: <br />trucking operation and a service station), the completed Centre Pointe <br />redevelopment would be considered an environmental benefit. The areas <br />immediately adjacent to Centre Pointe are currently fully developed and <br />the completion of Centre Pointe, thus, is not expected to cause any <br />reasonably foreseeable future development in the area. <br /> <br />31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts: If the project may cause any <br />adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed by items 1 through <br />28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. <br /> <br />All known and anticipated environmental impacts were previously addressed in <br />questions 1 through 30. <br /> <br />32. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: (This section need not be completed if the "EAW" <br />is being done/or "EIS" scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft <br />Scoping Decision document which must accompany the "EA W".) List any <br />impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation <br />before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative <br />measures that have been or maybe considered for these impacts and issues, <br />including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. <br /> <br />1. Traffic - The overall conclusion of the traffic analysis report is that the current <br />proposed Centre Pointe development would not cause any significant negative <br />traffic impacts at the any of the 10 intersections that have been examined. The <br />traffic impacts associated with the current Centre Pointe development <br />proposal are nearly identical to the impacts that would have been experienced <br />with the Centre Pointe development proposals approved in April of 200 1, <br />February of2000 and in the spring of 1997. <br /> <br />Page 33 <br />