pf_02026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Implementation of Design Standards Changes Page 25 OE[~IC..4. TION OF RIGHTS-OF -WI\ Y At'-.JO f.ASEr.1ENTS Back in 1979, the c;uestiQ!1 of policies re!'3tin; to the crit~:-ia for requiri~g dedication of rights-.)f ,way and ease:T!ents W3S e'(Clbljshed by the adoption of Resolution Number 6821, 'J copy o~ which is attached and labeled A;:,)endix 7. The 2doption of this resolution was recommended by the Public Works Oir...ctor at that time, Charles Honchel!. Also attached is a copy of a memo (Appendix 3) from Mr. Har.chell to the City Manager dated AJ:ril 11, 1979. The resolution was adopted 1-..1ay 21, 1979. Review of these standards and criieria w;~h the Enyineed:1g and Building Departments suggests that the policy as it exists is appropriate. You will note SQm~ difference between the resolution and the memo thCit recommended it. One of these is very important. You wm note that if] the list of criteria adopl~d in the resoiution that number 7 which states: "building permits on aJl parcels from which no right-of-way 01' easement as ever been provided if such rights-of-way or easements are necessary to comply with City or County roadways or utility standards", This pr;Jvis!on differs f:'om :lumber 9 in the memo which &.pparently dejc"es the dedication requirement even though shown on the County's Master Plan 'f it is "fol' work .....hich is currently not scheduled to take pla~e". Point number 7 in the resulution makes no distinction for work not currently scheduled. One may ask whether or not dedication should be requi:ed if a PUD is filed, processed, and approved, A PUD requ:res a Special Use Permit and is thus covered in item number 5 of the resoluticn, which inchwes all Special Use Permjts. One other action not listed i~ that of a rl.zoning. In 'TIost cases, a rezDniog will not occur ur,lp.ss a building perm:;. i~ required, However,:n some cases a rezoning may take p12ce far ,jf1 existing structure, and a buildir.g permit may !\Ot involve an expansion and in fact moa}' in~olv~ no bUilding permit at all, Would it not seem appropriate to requ,r~ dedication if a rezoning i:> approved, which obviously would reflect a chnge in land use direction i./S de",jgnat~d by the Comprehensive Pian andior the Loning Ordinance. Tl1us, we suggest that consideration be lji\'en to addin'J cHi eleventh criter.a, that of a rezoning action,