pf_02046 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mark Rancone, Case No. 2046 :'age 2 5. That no r.:Jofip.g ,"echanic~l units be visible from the gro'..lnd. 6. That al: trash handling be enclosed in the b~ilding. 7. That staff review final landscaping, drainage plans including landscaping on south sides of the building, and around box on the south side of the building. light ing, and t~e ~orth Gir.d the electricz.l 8. That final exterior colcr~ be reviewed by City staff. 9. At such time as the City det~rmin~s that a parking problem exists, the o.mer shall be required to provide additional parking north of the building as sholo''1 on plans submitted December 29, 1989. 10. That no Certificate of Occupancy be ~ssued for any of the remaining 2~,OOO squ3re feet until the remainder ~f exterior requirements are completed. In J:;muary of th is year Mr. Rancone and Dan C':)I!'.J!i::n:s of. ~oseville Prvperties met with the City staff to discuss the possihility of r~considering the conditions attached to th~ Sp€cia~ uSE< Permit and variance, since REI (camping and sport-ing goods store) was scheduled to move in as a ten~nt in ~he building in March, filling the remaining 24,000 square feet of space. Their letter ~f 21 J3nuary is attached. We told them they had the right to apply for a new variance, but also told them several times th2t we believed the original conditions were reasonable, th~t they w~re the minimum conditions acceptable to the City, and that a further modification of them \oras not lH~ely to be approved. They applied for the varia~ce, citing financial considerations, but the applicatio~ was delayed ana could ~ot ~e consid~r€d until the May Planning ccm..'ilission !!I~eting, well after the March 1 opening of REI. In light of this r ...e secured a bond fro!!! I'll'. CCImners fc>:r $50,000 (the approximate co~t to complet~ the exterior work) which the City may caLl if the "3riance is denied 3!1d tl1e v.'Ork is not co~pleted as requiL~~. Several times ~e asked ~he applicants t~ supply us with ~ detail~4 drawing vr other represent.?,;'" Qn of exactly ,,'hat they were applying for, so that we could cc:mpar~ this with the apt:'!.-oved buildIng pla..s, and so we could include such a drawing in our planning report.: to the Commission aad Council. This ..'35 not. supplied until after the deadline for the May rnseting, further delaying the item ~rom the May meeting to the Jum~ r::ectir>g. The attachEd phot;:os represent their request: ~o keep ~he building as is.