My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1117
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2015 4:31:05 PM
Creation date
12/9/2014 6:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 17, 2014 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Finance Director Miller responded from staff's perspective to the proposed in- <br /> come-based utility rate discount system, providing staff's findings and assump- <br /> tions to-date. Mr. Miller advised that, upon the City Council's decision to change <br /> the senior discount program to an income-based program earlier this year, staff <br /> had followed that up with an awareness campaign for residents. Mr. Miller ad- <br /> vised that the campaign included advertising the change in the City's newsletter <br /> and other media sources, as well as a direct mailing to every single-family home <br /> last spring. Of the 2,300 current senior discount recipients, Mr. Miller advised <br /> that staff had heard from seventy of them. Mr. Miller reported that roughly two- <br /> thirds of those contacts were for the purpose of gathering more information about <br /> the change and how to become eligible, but generally supportive of the change <br /> and expressing their thanks for having received the discount for many years, but <br /> realizing why the City Council implemented the change at this time. Of those <br /> seventy contacts, Mr. Miller reported that approximately one-third of that group <br /> was upset that they would not be receiving the discount or qualifying for it; and <br /> about half of that one-third basing their frustration by stating, "I've always got it <br /> and I've earned it"by paying taxes into the system and should continue to receive <br /> that entitlement. Mr. Miller reported that others in that same one-third stated that <br /> "I think I qualify with the financial need, but I'm not going to apply as I'm <br /> against welfare programs," even though both the senior and income-based pro- <br /> grams were subsidy programs. While recognizing the apparent disconnect, Mr. <br /> Miller noted that they were not perceived as the same thing. Mr. Miller reiterated <br /> that of the 2,300 current senior discount recipients, staff had only heard from sev- <br /> enty of those 2,300 households. <br /> Mayor Roe reported that he had only received a fairly small number of calls or e- <br /> mails. <br /> Councilmember Willmus reported that, while it came up during his door-to-door <br /> re-election campaign, it didn't appear to be a pressing issue, while still there. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that this was his rationale in questioning if the in- <br /> come qualification level was set too low. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that, after implementing the program at that level for a pe- <br /> riod of time and having experience on which to base future decision-making, the <br /> City Council could then revisit the income thresholds. <br /> During her re-election campaign, Councilmember McGehee reported that she had <br /> only heard from two residents who thought it would be a hardship; with others <br /> falling into the category of feeling they were entitled to a senior discount due to <br /> their age. Councilmember McGehee advised that, once she explained the City <br /> Council's rationale in making the program available to those most in need, her <br /> contacts were fairly supportive of that basic concept. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.