My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03359
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:54:26 PM
Creation date
5/13/2005 3:07:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3359
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Address
Twin Lakes
Project Name
Twin Lakes
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Denied
Date Final City Council Action
10/21/2002
Date Final Planning Commission Action
10/2/2002
Additional Information
Twin Lakes Rezoned to B-6, Mixed Use Business Park District
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Definitions: "Detrimental Impact" for pre-existin2. nonconformin2 uses <br /> <br />Expansions and changes of use of pre-existing nonconforming structures that do not comply with <br />current zoning or district can alter the character and property values of an established <br />development or neighborhood as well as future redevelopments in the area. Under state law, the <br />City Council, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, has little guidance to determine <br />when a proposed expansion, reconstruction, or change of use is substantially more detrimental to <br />the surrounding area (present and future planned). <br /> <br />The City project review criteria to determine "detrimental impact" in these "expansion or <br />change" cases, includes increased lot coverage; increased building mass; increased hours of <br />usage, traffic, noise, light, exhausts, hazardous materials storage, life safety improvements, and <br />other issues of concern. One effect of this type of regulation is that, while there is an "expansion <br />or change", overall the new use(s) or structure(s) detrimental impact will remain the same or <br />come closer to being a conforming use in the zoning district. <br /> <br />Chan2e from One Nonconformin2 Use to Another Nonconformin2 Use <br /> <br />The City will not allow any building with a nonconforming use to increase the detrimental <br />impact, be increased or enlarged, nor extended to occupy a greater area ofland if the building is <br />currently dimensionally pre-existing, nonconforming in regard to setbacks, existing floor area <br />ratio, or lot coverage regulations. In permitting a change in nonconforming use, the City may <br />require appropriate conditions and safeguards in accord with other provisions of the Code to <br />reduce the detrimental impact, such as the provision of landscaping and buffering, building and <br />fire code life-safety improvements, the improvement of parking areas, and restrictions on the <br />hours of operation. <br /> <br />In single user or single tenant buildings, the Council (Board of Zoning Appeals) may hear and <br />decide on applications to permit a change from one nonconforming use to another. The Council <br />may not permit such a change unless the new nonconforming use detrimental impact is 1) equal <br />to or less than the previous use, and 2) more compatible with permitted uses in the district in <br />which it is located. The intent of this section is to allow a pre-existing, nonconforming use to <br />adapt to changing economic considerations and prevent further deterioration or blight. An <br />application for a change of nonconforming use shall conform to the interim use permit <br />procedures. In multi-tenant buildings, where a portion of the building may change from one non- <br />conforming use to a non-conforming use, or an existing non-conforming use expands within the <br />existing building shell, the Community Development Director shall determine in writing, if the <br />non-conforming use in question creates more detrimental impact. <br /> <br />Burden of Establishin2 Status <br /> <br />The burden of establishing legal, pre-existing nonconforming use status rests on the person <br />asserting such status. Such persons shall provide sufficient proof to the City that such a pre- <br />existing nonconforming status exists. <br /> <br />\\Victoria\CommDev\Planning Files\3350-3399\3359 _ TwnLakesRez'gB-6\PF3359-RCA(l 021 02).doc <br /> <br />PF3359-RCA(J 021 02) Page 13 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.