pf_03359 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

"""h i I ,~_~ i'J V \ '" i"J ),d \J.?'~tl>.,,(>(;#( ~, REQUEST FOR ~bAJm":r~h:et);MM:ISSION ACTION Department Approval: DPW /TP Item Description: DATE: 10/21/02 ITEM NO: X. B. -J/J A A /J . /2...,rI:;; Agenda Section: I ~ ~ ORDINANCE Second reading of Twin Lakes rezoning to B-6, Mixed Use Business Park; and, a request by property owners for clarification of pre- existing, nonconforming uses and text within the Roseville City Code Section 1005.07 (B-6, Mixed Use Business Park Districts) prior to any rezoning (PF3359). 1.0 SUMMARY: In June, 2002, the City Council held a first reading for a Twin Lakes area map change from an assortment of uses and zones to a B-6, mixed use business park. At that time interested property owners requested the Council to protect their interests in the existing buildings and uses within Twm Lakes. A portion of the B-6 text language stated that the pre-existing non-conforming uses would not be allowed to expand, intensify or be replaced in kind. From July though September property owners, staff, and the Planning Commission met to consider methods of approving the rezoning while protecting the pre-existing and non-conforming uses and buildings now on the site should the zoning change to B-6. Some progress was made, wording was clarified, the text of the B-6 zoning ordinance is now being reviewed for clarity and inclusiveness consistent with the Master Plan. 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: On October 2,2002, the Planning Commission (and staff) recommended to the City Council that the Twin Lakes area B-6 rezoning request be denied. Instead, the Commission and staff recommended that, to remain consistent with the Council concept of market based redevelopment, the individual property owner should come forth with their B-6 rezoning requests at the time that their property is ready for redevelopment. This allows the pre-existing and/or non-conforming uses to remain "as-is" within the existing 1-2, 1-1, B-1, and B-4 zones. The Commission stated: Motion: Member Pepper moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend Any Planning Commission recommendation on language changes to the B-6 zoning district be tabled until November 4, 2002, and that the City Attorney and staff are to retain the existing pre-existing, nonconformity language, and further that the City Attorney and staff are to prepare specific clarification language for Section 1005.07 A and B regarding "permitted uses and ancillary uses". Member Traynor stated he will support the motion, change has been planned for 15 years, but the City must get moving on the site. The market will still drive the development on the site and that the City should encourage redevelopment of Twin Lakes. Carried 5-0. PF3359-RCA(I02102) Page 1 of 13