My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03377
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03377
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:56:56 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 1:34:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3377
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
Project Name
Minor Variance History
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
1974 - 1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ 6.03[5] <br /> <br />ZONING <br /> <br />6-22.2 <br /> <br />The grounds for imposing conditions on a variance are found in <br />the express ordinance language granting such power or the general <br />language of enabling statutes authorizing the issuance of variances. <br />Judicial interpretation of this general language suggests that condi- <br />tions are imposed to protect the general purpose, intent and spirit of <br />the zoning ordinance.114 The conditions are a means to safeguard <br />the public's health115 and safety.116 More specifically, the conditions <br /> <br />(Text continued on page 6-23) <br /> <br />114 Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 225 N.Y. 126, 174 N.E. 301 (1931); <br />Exxon, Inc. v. City of Frederick, 36 Md. App. 703, 375 A.2d 34 (1977). <br />115 Peekskill Packing Co. v. Board of Health, 172 Misc. 176, 14 N.Y.S.2d 229 <br />(1939), rev'd on other grounds, 261 App. Div. 915, 25 N.Y.S.2d 366 (1941); Caruso <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.