pf_03509 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Community Development Department 651-490-2279 . fax: 651-490-2931 . The four properties located in the southwest comer adjacent to County Road Band Snelling Avenue and the northern portion of the Har Mar Mall property must be included in any redevelopment plan (scenario 1 and 2). . A traffic study is required that provides staff with an understanding of the current traffic generated from the Target/Wellington sites and what the increase will be upon full redevelopment. Full redevelopment includes all proposed retail areas identified on the plans and the two outlots being included in the study. . The proposed main vehicle entry (County Road B) has been determined to be unacceptable due to the vehicle/pedestrian conflict created. This is the main pedestrian entry into the Super Target, which access must not share the main vehicle entry. Staff is will be curious to review the traffic consultant findings regarding this design. . The proposed plan to vacate and internalize Commerce Street and the frontage road adjacent to Snelling Avenue is unacceptable. Access from at least two of the parcels located in the southwest comer of the site must be provided. This can be accomplished by either keeping Commerce Street and the Frontage Road in its existing configuration; closing it off (vacating the right-of-way) and providing internal access through cross easements to the northern two properties (office and Perkins); or designing a new public road connecting Commerce Street to County Road B. . Submittal of a drainage plan that has receivt(Yreview and comment from the Rice Creek Watershed. Said plan should illustrate the necessary storm water management options suggested by Rice Creek. . Although the plans indicate that fire access will be maintained during construction of the new Super Target on the former State Farm site, the Roseville Fire Marshall (John Loftus) does not believe that appropriate access to fire connections and emergency existing can be maintained during construction. This issue must be resolved prior to forwarding a recommendation to the Planning Commission. . A signage plan must be submitted for review by the City Planner that includes all proposed buildings/uses, prior to a recommendation being forwarded to the Planning Commission. This plan must incorporate any and all pylon/monument signs and anticipated building facade signage if different than the allowance of the Roseville City Code (10% or 200 sq. ft.). II Identification of all trash enclosures or their internal location within each building. City Code requires all trash/recycling enclosures to be within a fully enclosed and roofed structure attached to the principal structure (see Section 1011 of the Roseville City Code).