Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />1488-84 <br />Wllliam & Lorna Jones <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />3. With relpect to the cost of the d~velopment of a public street ver ~ a <br />private drlve, we have requested th~t the Engineering Department prepare <br />.uch an estimate for the Planning C~~ission and Council', con.ideration. <br />Whatever these cOBts, it would appear reasonable to avoid paying for .ny <br />signiflcant portion of the road cost t~lce. You will recall that solution <br />CNl;e about only because the applicant proposed it at the fiut Planning <br />Commission meeting and the Council accepted that .olution in it. <br />recommendatlon to the Plarning Commieslon Bfter an lnfo~al dilcussion of <br />the project at a previous work session. <br /> <br />4. The Engineerlng Department will also comment O~ the possibil1ties of the <br />third alternative, that of building a portion of thp roadway on a priv~te <br />b.sis in a manner so as to not require itl re~oval when the public ,treet <br />is constructed. <br /> <br />S. It wo~ld appear that the land use. and the PUD Dcv~lopmcnt concept i. no <br />longer the question. The Council is making this additional request to the <br />Plannlng Commission imple~ontlng its desire to arrive at the most <br />appropriate and reasonable method of handling interim and/or long-range <br />acceas to the site. You may v'ish to refer to last month's report for any <br />additional information regarding the development and a copy of the plan. <br />submitted by the applicanL in the alllended proposal submi tted for the 6 <br />June meeting of the Co=mission. <br />