Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br /> <br />The Commission asked if the shed should be removed to reduce total lot <br />coverage. Member Mulder suggested removal as a condition. <br /> <br />Dick Shane, assistant to Mr. Prokop, noted that the shed housed the pool <br />equipment and the piping leads to the pool, which becomes a hardship to be <br />removed. (Mr. Prokop was unable to attend the meeting). <br /> <br />Member Stone expressed concern with the 60-day extension rule and reminded <br />the Planning Commission of possible actions that could be taken.. <br /> <br />There being no further comments, the Chair closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Traynor moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to <br />recommend approval of a 15% variance (1,541 square feet) to Section <br />1004.01A6 and a 1 foot variance to Section 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City <br />Code for Richard & Joan Prokop, to allow the addition of a 913 square attached <br />garage onto their home at 700 County Road B2, based on the findings in Section <br />5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated December 4,2002. <br /> <br />Ayes: 4 <br />Nays: 2 (Member Stone: impervious surface; Member Mulder: garage height <br />and size) <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Member Mulder suggested that the height of the new three car garage was not <br />consistent with the height of the Prokop rambler. Chair Duncan said putting the <br />cars in the garage improves the sight appearance more than the height deters. No <br />further accessory structures would be allowed on the site. <br />