Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />is most <br />of the existing garage, the location driveway, and options available. These options <br />include: a detached garage in the rear yard that would be pennitted without the need for a <br />variance or conditional use pennit, but does not centralize storage and creates inconveniences <br />during inclement weather. A rear yard detached garage would reduce the size of the applicant's <br />back yard and come close to maximizing impervious coverage on the parcel. Further, the <br />addition could be placed at the rear of the existing garage (east/west fashion) but would create a <br />difficult design and look out of character with the home. <br /> <br />5.5 The applicants will also build a second-story master bedroom and study over the existing <br />attached garage to increase their living area. This proposal does not require approvals by the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />5.5 Section 1013.02 states: 'Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in <br />the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council <br />shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary <br />any such provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may <br />impose such additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. <br /> <br />5.6 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests for <br />variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping ,vith the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations <br />alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists <br />under the terms ofthe ordinance....The board or governing body as the case may be <br />may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to <br />protect" <br /> <br /> <br />5.7 Staff analysis of undue hardship factors is as follows: <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Holmgren/Distad parcel is afforded <br />two options that can meet the required setback of the Roseville City Code, but these <br />locations have been detennined to be impractical and unreasonable. A third stall <br />attachment to the rear of the existing garage will create design challenges and appear out <br /> <br />PF3545 - RPCA 020404 - Page 3 of 5 <br />