Laserfiche WebLink
<br />are <br />area <br /> <br /> <br />M. What are the review, hearing, and permit processes used within the retail area <br />as it evolves over time and how effective are they? <br /> <br />N. What are the collaborative efforts and incentives used for better, more <br />flexible designs compatible with residential areas? <br /> <br />O. What models are there for continued working relationships with adjacent <br />residential areas? <br /> <br />P. What type of public space and infrastructure will be created based upon the <br />development and what is the impactlbenefits to the parks and public works <br />long term plans. <br /> <br />3.2 After review of these findings with the Planning Commission and City Council at public <br />meetings, additional findings by the Council and Planning Commission could be <br />incorporated into the moratorium justification report. <br /> <br />3.3 Based on the approved report on July 12th, the staff will present a proposed moratorium <br />ordinance to the Council for a second reading on July 19th. <br /> <br />4.0 SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />4.1 Hold a first reading, gather input. <br /> <br />4.2 By motion, set July 19th as the second reading date and a time to take action <br /> <br />Prepared by: Dennis Welsch (792-7071) <br /> <br />'Wictoria\CommDev\PLANNING AND ZONING\PLANNING FILES\3550-3599\3552_ Twin Lakes Stakeholders <br />Panel\Moratorium\RCA _ Moratorium(07 J 204).dcc <br /> <br />PF3552 - ReA (07-12-04) - Page 3 <br />