My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03596
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:36:13 PM
Creation date
4/28/2006 12:54:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3596
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2360 LEXINGTON AVE N
Project Name
Kinderberry Hill Child Care
Applicant
Rose of Sharon Manor
Status
Approved
Date Final Variance Board Action
9/1/2004
Planning Files - Resolution #
3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />5.4 <br /> <br />In 2002 and 2003, approved variances <br />B-Dale Club allowing a ground sign to bc placed one foot from <br />Lexington Avenue and Dale Street for reasons. <br /> <br /> <br />and <br />adjacent <br /> <br />5.5 The City Planner has reviewed this situation and determined there is justification <br />granting a VARIANCE to Section 1 009.03M of the Roseville Code. <br /> <br />5.6 In Section 1013 the Code states ..,.. Where there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, <br />the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and <br />public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose <br />and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers <br />necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and <br />substantial justice done. <br /> <br />5.7 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their <br />strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to <br />the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect". <br /> <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: Although a ground sign could be placed to meet the <br />requircments of the City Code, the location needed (within the parking lot, obscuring the <br />exit/entry view, or places in the fences play area) is not reasonable. The location selected <br />does provide a setback from the parcel property line and will not obscure the view of <br />those vehicles attempting to turn left from Grandview Avenue or Lovell Land. The <br />Community Development Staff has determined that the property can be put to a <br />reasonable use under the official controls if a VARIANCE is granted. <br /> <br />PF3596 RVBA 090104 - Page 3 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.