My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-02-03_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015-02-03_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 10:27:25 AM
Creation date
2/6/2015 10:27:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />1 <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />2 <br />JANUARY 6, 2015 <br />3 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL ~ 6:30pm <br />4 <br />5 <br />PRESENT: <br />6 D. Holt, M. Holt, Doneen, Gelbach, Newby, Stoner <br />ABSENT: <br />7 Azer, Bogenholm, Diedrick, Wall, all notified staff about being unable to attend <br />STAFF: <br />8 Anfang, Brokke <br />9 <br />10 <br />INTRODUCTIONS <br />111. <br />12 <br />ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />132. <br />14No Public comment at the start of meeting. Individuals in attendance reserved their comments for <br />15later in the meeting. <br />16 <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES – NOVEMBER 6, 2014 MEETING <br />173. <br />18November 6, 2014 minutes passed unanimously. <br />19 <br />ACKNOWLEDGE NOTES – DECEMBER 2, 2014 MEETING <br />204. <br />21December 2, 2014 Commission Meeting proceedings were recorded as notes due to not having a <br />22quorum at the meeting. <br />23 <br />DEER POPULATION DISCUSSION <br />245. <br />25Ten residents were in attendance for the deer population discussion. <br />26 <br />27Brokke summarized the information in the packet. <br />28The decision to control wildlife is up to the individual communities in Ramsey County. <br />29In 2014, 61 deer were counted in Roseville. <br />30The deer count took place in a .77 square mile area designated as deer habitat by Ramsey <br />31County. <br />32 <br />33Community member comments followed Brokke’s report; <br />34Comments varied between those being in favor and those not being in favor of a deer <br />35management program. <br />36First comment voiced their lack of faith in deer count and the numbers– wondered about the <br />37possibility of counting deer more than once. <br />38A number of attendees spoke to the problem of feeding deer, specifically near Chatsworth. <br />39Neighbors feeding in this area have contributed to deer/vehicular concerns. <br />40Residents near Ladyslipper Park have come close to hitting deer on the roads due to deer <br />41trying to get to neighborhood feeding stations. <br />42Many in attendance asked the Commission to suggest to the Council that an ordinance <br />o <br />43be implemented to ban wildlife feeding in Roseville. <br />44Community members commented on how the deer population has grown and the local habitat <br />45has decreased, resulting in deer eating gardens and plantings. <br />46Community members also recognized the potential health issues such as a deer tick problem <br />47due to the significant presence of deer in Roseville. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.