150212_CE_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Community Engagement Commission Minutes January 15, 2015 – Draft Minutes Page 6 of 18 226 Chair Grefenberg clarified CivicPlus was in at zero not because there was no value in their 227 program but because it staff had was decided not to invite them to submit. Staff Liaison 228 Bowman stated CivicPlus was not a for-sale program and they did not support it like that so there 229 was nobody to submit it to. It was a feature of the website. Grefenberg added that therefore, 230 based upon Bowman’s recommendation, the Committee Chair Grefenberg stated they did not 231 evaluate CivicPlus. 232 233 Chair Grefenberg stated since this is a committee recommendation, it would be implies a motion 234 to recommend Granicus as the provider of the civic engagement module. 235 236 Motion passed unanimously. 237 238 239 b. Commission Consideration of its December Joint Meeting with the Council 240 241 Chair Grefenberg asked if there were any points or comments the Commissioners wanted to 242 make on the joint meeting. There being no comments the Chair moved on to the next agenda 243 item. 244 245 There were no comments made. 246 247 248 c. Implementation Planning for 2015 Priority Projects 249 250 A copy of the Commission’s Priority Projects as revised by the Council is hereby attached and 251 made part of this record. 252 253 i. Assist and Encourage the Formation of Roseville Neighborhood Associations 254 Chair Grefenberg stated they had a summary of all of the recommendations, which deal with 255 community engagement. The recommendations and policies pick up civic engagement in more 256 than one section. He combined all recommendations relating to neighborhoods and associations 257 into one document so whoever was the Commission’s lead on this effort would develop a similar 258 complete and comprehensive to track his or her work on the issue. did this because he felt he 259 personally could like each person who takes the lead on these projects to do it in a similar 260 manner so they did not miss anything. He stated these were all of the recommendations and 261 policies they wanted to come up with for a work plan. 262 263 Chair Grefenberg noted Edina had a detailed neighborhood association policy and they called out 264 which articulated the ways the city could assist in the formation and sustaining of the 265 neighborhood association. The next one Another example was St. Louis Park, which whose 266 process was a much simpler approach. He asked if there were any questions on this issue. 267 268 He Grefenberg noted added that Next Door is was a significant component factor of in 269 neighborhood formation and achieving a sense of identity of neighborhoods; and there has 270 already been some progress in reinforcing the neighborhood role of NextDoor on that item that 271