My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0309
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:45:46 PM
Creation date
3/27/2015 2:05:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/9/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 9, 2015 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Commissioner Newby responded that, while deer seemed to be driving the prob- <br /> lem, it had become apparent during the Commission's study to have a feeding ban <br /> only for deer; and based on their research in ordinances from other communities, <br /> it became easy to get around that restriction if limited to deer. Commissioner <br /> Newby noted that some residents attending their discussions had also expressed <br /> concern with turkey, geese and coyotes and other wildlife other than deer. <br /> Commissioner Stoner concurred, noting that with the exception of one communi- <br /> ty, they qualified their ordinance as a wildlife management program to address <br /> feeding in general and avoid potential enforcement issues if a violator stated their <br /> intent was to feed something other than deer, and deer inadvertently ate the food. <br /> Chair Holt advised that the Commission's recommendation was for a comprehen- <br /> sive wildlife plan, not just the feeding ordinance portion. Chair Holt noted that <br /> during the Commission's research and through considerable public engagement, <br /> they heard numerous comments from residents on other wildlife issues, even <br /> though deer was the focus. Therefore, Chair Holt advised that recommending a <br /> comprehensive wildlife plan made sense as part of the City's regulations. <br /> While she may agree in principle, Councilmember McGehee referenced the num- <br /> ber of e-mails received to-date, some of which were included in tonight's materi- <br /> als while others were received by her directly. Councilmember McGehee stated <br /> that she knew for a fact that natural habitat area creation and/or preservation were <br /> high on the interest list of residents when the Commission had done their resident <br /> survey. However, Councilmember McGehee noted that the City had actually re- <br /> duced natural areas, part of which could be removal of invasive plant species <br /> which was a good thing; however, it impacted areas of natural habitat, which may <br /> have also created some of the wildlife crowding issues being experienced. While <br /> it's fine to discuss ways to alleviate the community's problematic deer population, <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that a large segment of the community's resi- <br /> dents valued wildlife and natural habitat and that it was important to keep that in <br /> mind. <br /> As for the deer herd, Councilmember McGehee noted that not all of the wildlife <br /> was specific to Roseville but migrated from and throughout other suburbs as well. <br /> Therefore, Councilmember McGehee opined that the surveys in Roseville may <br /> not actually be accurate on any given day, or define where the herd was actually <br /> living. In her review of the map provided in the packet, Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee noted the deer populations were occurring predominantly in Ramsey County <br /> natural areas and open space, as determined with fly-over surveys. <br /> Chair Holt concurred, adding another population near Lake Owasso. <br /> Councilmember McGehee acknowledged that this was also another natural area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.