CC_Minutes_2015_0218 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Meeting Retreat Tuesday, February 18, 2015 Page 9 (Subgroup: Councilmember Etten and Community Development Director Bilotta and Po- lice Chief Mathwig) Effective Governance (Subgroup: Mayor Roe and Fire Chief O'Neill) Infrastructure Sustainability (Subgroup: Councilmember Willmus and Public Works Director Schwartz and Parks & Recreation Director Brokke) Organizational Effectiveness (Subgroup: Councilmember Laliberte and Finance Director Miller) Prior to break-out, Mr. Rapp responded to a written public question left by an audience member earlier in the morning, questioning his definition of "community." Mr. Rapp stated that he used that term in its broadest context and as it applied to any and all stake- holders involved with the City or Roseville (e.g. anyone with ties to Roseville, having in- vestment property in Roseville, a life-long resident, or any agency or other Roseville stakeholder). Groups started this exercise at approximately 1:00 p.m., with Mr. Rapp reiterating the goal of this step was to define a general theory of governance and how it worked. In clar- ifying this process, Mr. Rapp suggested the subgroups consider the following ownership and roles of stakeholders: City Council: owns purpose, direction, success definition and accountability Staff: owns action plans, methods and performance Shared: perspectives, creation and accountability Mr. Rapp suggested it would serve better to put out clear, outcomes/expectations or pur- poses by the City Council, and leaving it up to staff to work the rest out as indicated. Therefore, Mr. Rapp asked that the subgroups try to refrain themselves from problem solving and stick to strategy only, rather than getting bogged down in the"how." 5. Finalize Key Outcome Indicators Reports were provided by each subgroup, listing their interpretation of Key Outcome In- dicators (KOI's). Civic Engagement(Subgroup: Councilmember McGehee and City Manager Trudgeon) Priorities: Connection; Transparency; Authenticity; Communication; Proactive; Time- ly/early;Process;Broad/inclusive; Valued Key Outcome Indicators (KOI) Community Satisfaction Target: Some percentage (90%) expressing satisfaction with the process, not necessarily the outcome, but the process itself through responses to the periodic community survey.