My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
5/21/2015 12:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 4, 2015 <br /> Page 22 <br /> about how nice it would be to have a Lowe's or Home Depot franchise in Rose- <br /> ville, and suggested they'd be considered"big box," suggesting the need for CU if <br /> considered a P use. <br /> Councilmember Etten concurred with Councilmember Laliberte, and depending <br /> on how Subarea B was drawn and its connections; with Subarea B fine with him <br /> for a P use with CU. However, Councilmember Etten reiterated his cautions de- <br /> pending on the map borders and definition developed for"big box." <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus for other potential businesses included <br /> in this use (e.g. the Tile Shop), Mayor Roe suggested revisiting NP as the process <br /> continued and to determine if it met the definition. <br /> Without objection, Mayor Roe concluded that this use was NP in Subareas A and <br /> C at this time; and was a P use with CU only in Subarea B. <br /> Commercial: Retail Csmaller scale) <br /> Mayor Roe noted that this use was permitted in all commercial zones and of- <br /> fice/business park zones in the City; with current HDR zoning in the area north <br /> indicating NP. However, Mayor Roe suggested this may change further as zoning <br /> changes. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested leaving it as is. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted the new Target business model for mini-stores <br /> and questioned how that would fit. <br /> Mr. Bilotta noted the need to define"small scale retail" as well as "big box." <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested leaving it as a P use throughout. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted the lower part of Subarea A was just north of the <br /> Wal-Mart development, and would push small retail against the lake and park if <br /> left as is. Councilmember Laliberte supported it as a P use with CU only in Sub- <br /> area A. <br /> Councilmembers McGehee and Etten stated they would not support that, with <br /> Councilmember Etten expressing concern in getting too controlling and restrictive <br /> in permitted uses, while noting the need (to) (for) condition (all) uses to provide a <br /> buffer for the lake as one example. <br /> Without objection, Mayor Roe concluded this was a P use across the board at this <br /> point. <br /> Commercial: Vertical Mixed Use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.