Laserfiche WebLink
o Should the community survey instead remain in Civic Engagement but the KOI and <br />target be changed to reflect and measure community engagement? <br />• Participation of under-represented population <br />o What is the role of the on-going and future work of the Community Engagement <br />Commission in implementing this priority? <br />� Housin� and Redevelopment <br />• Are the metrics identified in the targets for all the KOPs acceptable (living wage jobs/value <br />increases? <br />• What role should the HRA play in the Housing and Redevelopment Strategic Initiatives? <br />• Move-up Housing <br />o How does High Density and Medium Density factor into any move-up housing <br />programs. <br />EfFective Governance <br />• RespectfulInteraction <br />o Should this remain as a KOI? <br />• Process Transparency <br />o Should Process Transparency be moved to Civic Engagement? <br />O��anizational E�'fectiveness <br />• Employee Satisfaction <br />o Should this KOI and the resulting employee survey be in the document at all? <br />• Suggested New KOI — Building Organizational Strength <br />o Should a new KOI be included and Employee Satisfaction be removed? <br />� o Targets to be considered under this KOI could include succession planning and building <br />depth of staff skillsets <br />• Resource Allocation <br />o Should target be changed to more clearly measure whether the City's resource allocation <br />meets citizen's priorities? <br />Infrastr�ucture Sustainability <br />• No changes identified <br />The list above is meant to be representative of the conversation on May l lth. If there are items/issued <br />that were brought forward during the discussion, please bring them up in the conversation. Also as <br />previously mentioned, if there are other thoughts or ideas that have come up since the last meeting, also <br />bring them forward. <br />As part of the public comment received at the May l lth meeting, it was noted that there were several <br />errors in the document. These have been corrected and the revised Policy Priority Planning Document <br />is included as Attachment C. Members of the public also brought forward objections to be <br />characterized as a"customer" versus a"citizen" and asked that the City's advisory Commissions <br />review the draft document. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />