Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Attachment B <br />DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 11, 2015 <br />Page 19 <br />value rentals and other targets identified and questioned whether those numbers <br />had come from. <br />Mr. Bilotta stated that staff had simply attempted to predicted what a reasonable <br />number of living-wage jobs may be in the two-year time frame for discussion <br />purposes only. <br />Regarding owner-occupied housing and rental value changes, Mr. Bilotta noted <br />that these estimates were for five years, through 2020, with considerable fluctua- <br />tion being seen at this time across the City, and staff's attempts to compare it with <br />inflation over that same five year period, again hard to predict and depending on <br />the numbers impacted by all units for that type of housing stock. <br />For clariiication, Mayor Roe noted that the targets would become part of the dis- <br />cussion for anything the Council eventually adopted, making staff's suggestions <br />make more sense. <br />Specific to the KOI for "SE Roseville, Councilmember McGehee congratulated <br />staff and the working group on their efforts to-date in starting from the bottom-up <br />to achieve a good plan for that area rather than trying to force it in one direction <br />or another, which she found to be a new approach for Roseville. However, Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee cautioned that the efforts of the working group not become <br />so formalized as to become a rigid extension of City government. <br />While supporting all of the strategic targets proposed by staff, regarding the initia- <br />tive to "establish a Twin Lakes economic development program," Councilmember <br />McGehee expressed her anticipation of what was projected. <br />Councilmember Etten echoed the comments of Councilmember McGehee specific <br />to the SE Roseville working group, as well as questioning long-term economic <br />development plans for the Twin Lakes area. Councilmember Etten stated that his <br />questions regarding move-up housing and rezoning had been addressed by Mr. <br />Bilotta's response to Councilmember Willmus's similar concerns. <br />Specific to the SE Roseville working group, Mayor Roe clarified that those efforts <br />were and should remain open to general public participation as well as that of the <br />neighborhood. Mayor Roe stated that he envisioned involving feedback from <br />people living and/or doing business there as well to make sure they were part of <br />the process. Mayor Roe also noted the need to look at a long-term redevelopment <br />plan for the area as a more formalized process as well as short-term efforts. <br />Speciiic to move-up housing, Mayor Roe stated he was leery of tying that to <br />MDR zoning, since he wasn't sure the values would be $350,000 or more; and <br />opined that multiple strategies were needed, with the MDR serving as only one <br />tool. Mayor Roe noted that single-family homes, similar to those having gone up <br />