My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0615_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0615_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2015 11:29:22 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:51:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SWOT Results – Weaknesses <br />Attachment A <br />Council <br />One councilmember's response to opposition or disagreement is viewed as a personal <br />attack, and responds in-kind often outside of council chambers leading to public cynicism and <br />polarization. <br />Some city staff advocate rather than analyze and provide options for counsel direction. <br />This is improving but still occurs from time to time. <br />External city communication is often focused on City Hall rather than neighborhood and <br />community issues. <br />The power of the status quo. <br />Lean staffing can limit ability to change or adapt easily. <br />Still a lot of silos in organization. <br />Improving at public engagement, but can do better. <br />Too much political focus on past disagreements, concerns, issues. Inability of some political <br />leaders and members of the community to move on once decisions are made. <br />Heavy reliance on retail and health care employment opportunities <br />Lack of "living wage" jobs <br />Lack of some housing options: <br />Medium to upscale senior housing <br />Upscale apartments <br />Upscale housing <br />Lack of neighborhood recognition and support <br />Lack of adequate contact about changes <br />Lack of requests for ideas <br />Lack of small, local service providers—coffee shop, bakery, dry cleaner, hardware... <br />Lack of vision <br />Piecemeal approach to planning <br />Lack of thorough and transparent policies that are consistently and strongly supported <br />Lack of engagement of the public at the "front end" of project or development planning <br />Lack of transparency in planning and development <br />Continued reliance on ideas from the past <br />Lack of Class A office buildings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.