My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22, 2015 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed that individuals could work on respectful interaction <br /> on their own,but opined that things were in a better spot than in the past. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested moving the community survey into the Organi- <br /> zational Effectiveness priority. <br /> Regarding resolving items as introduced, Councilmember Etten agreed that <br /> sometimes items may need deferral to receive additional information or for a rec- <br /> ommendation or clarification from a citizen advisory commission, but suggested <br /> that simply could involve providing additional information in packet materials for <br /> follow-through. <br /> Councilmember Etten supported retaining the process transparency KOI as being <br /> vitally important. <br /> Councilmember Etten recognized his appreciation of Councilmember Laliberte's <br /> idea to work with boards and staff assigned to those boards by providing clear di- <br /> rection allowing them to be more productive and positively engaged. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten opined that this was a good goal to retain, as he had heard com- <br /> ments from a number of advisory commissions that the City Council had not <br /> helped as much as they could have. <br /> Under a new document title of"City Council Priority Plan — 2015/2016," Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten suggested revising the goals to focus on just a few things that <br /> would end before a new City Council is seated and as follows: <br /> 1) Housing and Redevelopment; <br /> 2) Community Outreach/Communication(formerly civic engagement); <br /> 3) Infrastructure Sustainability; and <br /> 4) Effective Governance/Organizational Effectiveness <br /> Councilmember Willmus <br /> Councilmember Willmus thanked Councilmember Laliberte for providing her <br /> perspective; and offered his agreement with much that she had stated and the in- <br /> put from Councilmember McGehee. While appreciating the ranking or prioritiza- <br /> tion suggested by Councilmember Etten, Councilmember Willmus was unable to <br /> fully support that, and agreed that "Effective Governance" and "Organizational <br /> Effectiveness" could fall off. <br /> In reviewing strategic priorities and tasking citizen advisory commissions, Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus opined that civic engagement specifically could fall within <br /> the role of the CEC. When starting this process, Councilmember Willmus noted <br /> his understanding that this would identify several areas of focus for the City <br /> Council over the next two years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.