My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0713
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2015 3:20:20 PM
Creation date
7/24/2015 3:50:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/13/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 13,2015 <br /> Page 14 <br /> conversational approach or training for those performing the assessment. Mayor <br /> Roe opined that if individual assessors were simply presented with a checklist that <br /> they didn't fully understand the purpose of, it made it difficult to make a valid as- <br /> sessment. <br /> As an example, Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of training Depart- <br /> ments to evaluate this program, performing that assessment under the direction of <br /> the City Manager; but questioned if the City Council could look at the assessment <br /> tool and actually perform it. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that it may depend on the situation, using the example of a <br /> group exercise at the LMC training and various interpretations by participants and <br /> pre-conceived perceptions, which could also equate to the City Council and po- <br /> tential perceptions it held of citizens that were not necessarily accurate. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte also referenced misperceptions the public may have of <br /> the City Council or vise versa, such as "the fix is in," or"they've already made up <br /> their minds." <br /> Mayor Roe noted those perceptions were often informed by past experience; and <br /> as he interacts with the public, he frequently hears them state that once they un- <br /> derstand the issue or project, they no longer have a certain perception, but are ap- <br /> preciative of having a better understanding. Mayor Roe noted the need for all <br /> parties to own up to their particular misperceptions as part of the engagement pro- <br /> cess. <br /> Councilmember McGehee referenced the recent Dale Street Project and its col- <br /> laborative process as a very positive example of empowering residents through <br /> that process, and creating a large coalescing of neighborhoods or citizens around <br /> an issue. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined it may become difficult when comparing the <br /> Dale Street process, with a city-controlled property, when trying to implement or <br /> carry forward with that same process when it involves a third party or private <br /> property. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the need at that time to identify the community engagement <br /> process; with the key going into it to acknowledge where that process was at the <br /> spectrum of engagement and depending on the situation as noted by Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus. Mayor Roe opined that the real need was to get that spec- <br /> trum identification out upfront, whether the City is controlling a project or only <br /> informing citizens or something in-between. <br /> Whether it involved staff, the City Council, or CEC, Councilmember Laliberte <br /> added that while the City often referenced where something was at in the process, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.