Laserfiche WebLink
3. Minutes <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, July 21, 2015 <br />Page 5 <br />1 <br />2 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that they had asked the family to allow staff to videotape the project for <br />3 <br />future HRA marketing as well. <br />4 <br />5 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka as to any others showing interest in this type of project in the <br />6 <br />coming future, Ms. Kelsey reported that while there had been a few contacts and preliminary <br />7 <br />discussions at this point, there were not commitments to report. <br />8 <br />9 <br />Chair Maschka thanked Mr. Tharaldson for a quality project and encouraged them to “get it <br />10 <br />done.” <br />11 <br />12 <br />b.Strategic Planning <br />13 <br />Ms. Kelsey turned the meeting over to Consultant Barbara Raye to continue the process and <br />14 <br />narrow the list of priorities from the current thirty-one listed initiatives and for better focus. <br />15 <br />Ms. Raye sought a consensus from the Board as to how long of a term was preferred for the <br />16 <br />Strategic Plan, suggesting four years versus five would be more manageable. Ms. Raye also <br />17 <br />sought feedback on how the HRA Board preferred their presentation to be done to the City <br />18 <br />Council at the next joint meeting with them, and whether they wanted her attendance and <br />19 <br />assistance if needed. Ms. Raye opined that it seemed a more direct conversation between the <br />20 <br />HRA Board and City Council would be more beneficial from her perspective, but offered to be <br />21 <br />available if and as needed. <br />22 <br />23 <br />Chair Maschka suggested that the five major points were well represented, and would serve as <br />24 <br />a beautiful approach as had worked well in the past; and asked that Ms. Raye be available at <br />25 <br />the joint meeting to help as applicable. <br />26 <br />27 <br />The consensus of the body was for a four-year Strategic Plan as recommended by Ms. Raye <br />28 <br />29 <br />DRAFT Roseville HRA Draft Strategic Plan 2015 (Attachment A) <br />30 <br />31 <br />Mission / Values <br />32 <br />Ms. Raye reviewed the HRA’s existing Mission and Value statements, taken directly from the <br />33 <br />HRA website, suggesting they remained relevant and she saw no necessary changes needed. <br />34 <br />35 <br />Planning Assumptions <br />36 <br />Ms. Raye noted this was developed as part of the HRA’s SWOT exercise and represented their <br />37 <br />identification of challenges and opportunities moving forward as a precursor to their updated <br />38 <br />goals. At the request of Ms. Raye, members concurred that those statements accurately <br />39 <br />reflected their discussion and set a context for the updated Strategic Plan. <br />40 <br />41 <br />Strategic Goals (Buckets) <br />42 <br />Ms. Raye advised that she retained several titles from the HRA’s current Strategic Plan, <br />43 <br />opining that they still seemed appropriate for the update. Ms. Raye briefly reviewed each of <br />44 <br />the five goals from a broad perspective; suggesting some may be combined, but were shown <br />45 <br />independently at this time. <br />46 <br />47 <br />While the HRA Board didn’t speak to any activities or initiatives that were missed from <br />48 <br />previous discussions, Chair Maschka noted several interpretations were shown that were not <br />49 <br />based on his recollection or understanding of previous discussions; and were addressed as <br />50 <br />discussions continued by individual members. <br />51 <br />52 <br />Goal 1. Prevent and eliminate physical and social blight on individual properties, <br />53 <br />neighborhoods and the entire community <br />54 <br />B. Regarding 3-5 infill projects (1 per year), Chair Maschka advised that the intent was not to <br /> <br />