Laserfiche WebLink
445 the street or the other. Councilmember McGehee opined this was not something one even <br />446 typically thought about when purchasing a home, or the potential variables in cost, nor <br />447 was it part of their normal due diligence in that purchase. <br />448 <br />449 Regarding City liability and costs, Chair Stenlund asked if it would be of value to the City <br />450 Council for the PWETC to make recommendations on a potential ceiling for the cost of <br />451 rehabilitation of the laterals, capping the cost for homeowners and the point the City <br />452 should or could step in to share those costs. <br />453 <br />454 By consensus, City Councilmember supported that sugAr <br />tion. <br />455 <br />456 Councilmember Willmus expressed appreciation alrehis additional perspective <br />457 from the PWETC particularly preventative measues. Councilmember Willmus suggested <br />458 additional consideration should be discussed about, potential steps the City can take as <br />459 laterals are repaired to make sure City inspectors,are reviewing and monitoring those new <br />460 lines from a basic perspective to ensure t e longevity of laterals, an avoid added future <br />461 expenses as part of preventative efforts. <br />462 <br />463 Pavement Management Plan PMP)/Delamination o treets/Sealco Mill and <br />464 Overlay/Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ratinzs <br />465 Councilmember McGehee expressed her hope that uture PWETC fieldirip would <br />466 include monitoring and following-up on the delaminatio e and research on the latest <br />no <br />467 thoughts and/or techVies to address that issue. <br />468 <br />469 Mayor Roe agr�edeferral <br />d with concerns of the PWETC on potetial impacts to streets with <br />470 delamination an of sealcoating that may have long-term effects on the PCL <br />471 Mayor Roe suggested different index standards may be needed in the future to address <br />472 those correlated costs, while maintaining a balance. As part of that review by the PWETC <br />473 and future recommendation to the Citouncil, Mayor Roe suggested their review of the <br />474 City's current assessment policy based on those funding challenges going forward and <br />475 whether changes were nededin hat policy that may include revised cost-sharing <br />476 calculations for those benefitting treet improvements. <br />477 <br />478 Pathway M Plan Implementation <br />479 Councilmember Willmus noted apparent issues among individual PWETC members during <br />480 their last ranking of the Pathway Master Plan, and no standard criteria in their individual <br />481 scoring exercises. Councilmember Willmus suggested that the PWETC's first step be to <br />482 develop such a common set of scoring criteria for their next review and ranking exercise, <br />483 opining that would be most beneficial to the commission and the community. <br />484 <br />485 Councilmember Laliberte reported on her research ofpotential grant monies for sidewalks <br />486 through the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP). Since the City Council <br />487 continued to hear from residents in their desire for more connectivity, and those sidewalks <br />488 and pathways were expensive to fund and prioritize accordingly, Councilmember Laliberte <br />489 suggested additional research on grant funds that may be available to accomplish those <br />490 efforts. <br />Page 11 of 16 <br />