Laserfiche WebLink
491 <br />492 <br />493 <br />494 <br />495 <br />496 <br />497 <br />498 <br />499 <br />500 <br />501 <br />502 <br />503 <br />504 <br />505 <br />506 <br />507 <br />508 <br />509 <br />510 <br />511 <br />512 <br />513 <br />514 <br />515 <br />516 <br />517 <br />518 <br />519 <br />520 <br />521 <br />522 <br />523 <br />524 <br />525 <br />526 <br />527 <br />528 <br />529 <br />530 <br />531 <br />532 <br />533 <br />534 <br />535 <br />Mayor Roe suggested the PWETC, in their review of the pathway system again, make it a <br />priority to consider connections between multi family residential buildings and transit, as <br />well as connecting with schools. Mayor Roe provided several examples he and <br />Councilmember Etten had discussed in their neighborhood in observing bus riders having <br />to walk on the grass or on the street to get to a bus stop because there was no available <br />pathway. Mayor Roe opined that making those short connections would certainly improve <br />the quality of life for those needing to use transit. <br />Solar Power Discussions <br />Councilmember Willmus expressed his desire for the PWETC and City Council to continue <br />their work on community solar and solar garden options, including the ability to write <br />grants as applicable. Councilmember Willms suggested one aspect should be <br />recommending if the PWETC feels an outside nt writer is needed to assist with those <br />efforts in a timely manner. <br />Councilmembers Laliberte and Etter spoke in support of continued solar ower resources <br />and more involvement. <br />Transportation <br />Councilmember Laliberte advisAdtlathe had spoken tier today with a Ramsey County <br />Commissioner serving on the Ramsey County Tran *t Advisory Board (TAB) who <br />questioned why the City of Roseville did not apply for more grants. Councilmember <br />Laliberte advised the the Commissioner noted, as a newer member of the TAB, money was <br />frequently going elsewhere as there were no applications being received from the <br />communities she represented. While the commissioner noted her feedback on the <br />cumbersome nature of those grant application processes, she suggested such feedback <br />would prove helpful going forward. Councilmember Laliberte suggested further research <br />by staff and the PWETC of particular grants that may be available for City participation. <br />Lea Picku Pro am Outreachoucation <br />Councilmember Laliberte agreed at options were needed for those residents who needed <br />to replace the leaf pickup program after discontinuation in 2015. While there are many <br />services available to perform raking and removal for residents, Councilmember Laliberte <br />noted the need for an option for residents choosing to rake and pile leaves on the curb for <br />pick-up. Councilmember McGehee noted several questions she'd received to -date from <br />residents seeking an option that would be comparable to the fee-based service they <br />previously received from the City. <br />Capital Improvement Program (CIP)/Role of the PWEC for Eauivment Replacement <br />Councilmember Laliberte encouraged the PWETC to work with staff to identify acceptable <br />standards and capital improvementprogram (CIP) funding for street improvementprojects <br />(e.g. suggestions for those accepted standards, timelines, and funding) toward matching <br />those efforts on a consistent basis. <br />Page 12 of 16 <br />