Laserfiche WebLink
See pages 7 - 15 - for excerpt of the Park & Recreation joint meeting. <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2015 <br />Page 13 <br />1 <br />Commission's good track record in involving the public over the years, and ex - <br />2 <br />pressed his confidence they would continue to do so going forward. <br />3 <br />4 <br />Chair Stoner clarified that the Commission would not intend the underground <br />5 <br />storage to be used as a climate -controlled maintenance area, but only for durable <br />6 <br />goods and/or electric golf cart storage, with maintenance and its related issues not <br />7 <br />intended for that area. Chair Stoner noted that this would involve storing and re - <br />8 <br />moving carts as needed from the basement area versus how they were stored up - <br />9 <br />stairs at this time. Chair Stoner advised that the intent would be for maintenance <br />10 <br />activities to remain in a separate building as done now. <br />11 <br />12 <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Chair Stoner advised that the intent <br />13 <br />would be for lawn mowers and similar equipment to be stored in a separate facili- <br />14 <br />ty as done currently. <br />15 <br />16 <br />Mayor Roe thanked the Commission for their work and noted the additional <br />17 <br />homework they were now tasked with going forward. <br />18 <br />19 <br />Councihnember Laliberte also thanked the Commission for their work on the <br />20 <br />wildlife ordinance and management policy recently enacted by the City Council. <br />21 <br />22 <br />Public Comment <br />23 <br />Mayor Roe recognized Finance Commission Vice Chair Justin Rohloff, and <br />24 <br />Commissioners Angela Byrne and Edwin Hodder present tonight and coming <br />25 <br />forward to speak. <br />26 <br />27 <br />Draft �Park Capital Funding Policy (Attachment A) <br />28 <br />Vice Chair Rohloff referenced an email previously provided to the City Council <br />29 <br />from Finance Director Miller outlining the three differences between the Finance <br />30 <br />Commission and Park & Recreation Commission's recommendations. <br />31 <br />32 <br />Vice Chair Rohloff further advised that the Finance Commission met after receiv- <br />33 <br />ing the Park & Recreation Commission's recommendations, as presented to the <br />34 <br />City Council tonight during their joint meeting, and had ratified their initial unan- <br />35 <br />imous support to remain with their three original recommendations. Vice Chair <br />36 <br />Rohloff noted this included a maximum allocation in the Park Dedication Fund of <br />37 <br />$900,000 versus $1 million in the park acquisition fund as outlined for park ac- <br />38;quisition. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff stated that the Finance Commission could not sup - <br />39 <br />' port retaining a $1 million balance based on historically averages over the last 6-7 <br />40 <br />years; and at which time there had been no allocation for CIP needs during that <br />41 <br />same time. <br />42 <br />43 <br />In response to the Park & Recreation Commission's Attachment A, Vice Chair <br />44 <br />Rohloff provided the scenarios previously provided by the Finance Commission <br />45 <br />for the Park Improvement Fund (PIP) based on assumptions, showing a $5 million <br />